-
-
People are still parroting this dumb weak era narrative?
Name any era as deep as this one. Ruddock was top-5 for most of the 90s and he got sparked by a Canadian that had over 20 losses. 45 yr old Foreman and 43 yr old Larry Holmes were top-5-10 in the 90s. Mercer who picked up boxing at age 23 was top-7 in the 90s and he’s no different from the Coffie that recently got sparked.
Wrestlers need to stick to WWE and leave boxing alone for those who know the sport.
Ortiz being top-10 is wrong since there are better boxers with better pedigree out there than him. And Wilder shouldn’t be anywhere near top-5.Comment
-
“what makes Povetkin, or Chisora so much better than the guys King Kong fought? Some of them started out looking promising... Like Parker, but I don't see any of these guys beating up Ortiz. And people never give Ortiz credit. he did not lose to the guys he fought, he faltered when the rest of them faltered...”
Do you see reason in this it’s your quote !
Comment
-
Silly Billy, you’re a casual and butthurt yank. You’re just mad American heavyweights are bums.
And you can’t give the other sports excuse because we just saw how poorly Americans in the lower weight divisions performed at the Olympics. Or are 5’4 midgets also leaving boxing for basketball and American football?
Comment
-
It is very laughable this era is highly competitive and filled with talent . People are still parroting this dumb weak era narrative?
Name any era as deep as this one. Ruddock was top-5 for most of the 90s and he got sparked by a Canadian that had over 20 losses. 45 yr old Foreman and 43 yr old Larry Holmes were top-5-10 in the 90s. Mercer who picked up boxing at age 23 was top-7 in the 90s and he’s no different from the Coffie that recently got sparked.
Wrestlers need to stick to WWE and leave boxing alone for those who know the sport.
Ortiz being top-10 is wrong since there are better boxers with better pedigree out there than him. And Wilder shouldn’t be anywhere near top-5.Comment
-
Silly Billy is a casual.
“what makes Povetkin, or Chisora so much better than the guys King Kong fought? Some of them started out looking promising... Like Parker, but I don't see any of these guys beating up Ortiz. And people never give Ortiz credit. he did not lose to the guys he fought, he faltered when the rest of them faltered...”
Do you see reason in this it’s your quote !
Comment
-
Most of them are just losers and it’s all about hype with them. Take Wilder and Ortiz out of the mix and this might be the most competitive HW era in history.
Those idiot will hype up a Ruddock who was the sparked out by a bum with over 20 losses in his prime but shyyyt on Dillian Whyte. Two 50 yr olds were top-10 throughout the 90s and one became a champion by beating a top-5 guy.
Lennox Lewis went life/death against a Mercer that picked up boxing at 23 and Mercer wasn’t different from Coffie.Comment
-
You wish redumber, you wish... yeah that's me... just snitching away... now let's hear whom I switched on... no redumber you left here cause you were owned, no snitching... it's in the threads...
Oh did I hurt your feelings silly Billy ?
This clown loves making threads about me though ,that’s o.K . Why don’t you snitch to the mods like you like to do . Ha
You are lying Silly Billy you said Ortiz hadn’t lost more then once makes him a top guy . Pinocchio is in the house again .
my posts are here, most people can read and see if I am lying or not... unfortunately for you... if I was the worse snitch in the world I could stop. You cannot ever change being a dum a s s
Comment
Tweet
Comment