"PACQUIAO BEATING SPENCE IS THE GREATEST WIN IN 147LBS HISTORY, IT'S NEVER BEEN DONE!"

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SplitSecond
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Nov 2009
    • 23151
    • 1,715
    • 1,187
    • 85,044

    #41
    You guys denigrate Pacquiao too much. He’d AGAIN be doing something that has never been done by beating Spence. Being the oldest welterweight champion(beating his own record), against the consensus #1 of the division. Who gives a *** if Spence is not an ATG?

    Comment

    • The Big Dunn
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Sep 2009
      • 70649
      • 10,199
      • 8,380
      • 287,568

      #42
      Originally posted by -Kev-

      I find it bizarre that you would ask that, in that manner, from my post. Spanish is my native language, English is my second. So I was second guessing myself as to why an American, who only speaks English I assume, would come up with such a specific question like that from my post. Like you asked it as if I said that, comparing Pacquiao vs Spence to Duran vs SRL. Just threw me completely off. Then you have an idiot quoting you saying “yeah that’s right there is no comparison!”. Suddenly, you turned my post into “this guy said Pac vs Spence is like Duran vs SRL.” And since it’s a fairly long post, no dummy will read it. They will go by what you read. Just bizarre all around. Americans need to get better at English comprehension. You guys have one language to learn, it’s really not that hard. I had to learn two languages.
      The guy created the thread about Duran and Barkley, not Duran and SRL. I also asked based on what you posted.

      I didn’t suggest or state you posted that specifically,. I was just asking a question.

      Comment

      • Spoon23
        INVINCIBLE
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Feb 2009
        • 20667
        • 940
        • 923
        • 107,969

        #43
        Originally posted by KingOfGlory
        It would be an amazing accomplishment for sure. It would be a disaster for Spence and the future of the division though.

        Anything less than a dominant performance and KO for Spence makes the current generation look terrible.
        Or maybe if Pac wins, he is just that great that even the current crops can't dance with him. You know the kind of athlete that comes once in a century. Could be..

        Comment

        • Spoon23
          INVINCIBLE
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Feb 2009
          • 20667
          • 940
          • 923
          • 107,969

          #44
          Originally posted by The Big Dunn

          The guy created the thread about Duran and Barkley, not Duran and SRL. I also asked based on what you posted.

          I didn’t suggest or state you posted that specifically,. I was just asking a question.
          You got iced buddy. Go back to your hole.

          Comment

          • fabie
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • May 2009
            • 1498
            • 246
            • 180
            • 10,255

            #45
            All the BS marginalization and minimalization of this fight AND both Spence and Pacquiao is simply “hateful”. Enjoy the best fight in decades and the significance of it.

            all the naysayers are just ‘negative nancies. Give credit where it is due…the fighters and this magnitude of a fight.


            Comment

            • Ryannn
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Dec 2008
              • 4459
              • 295
              • 55
              • 13,408

              #46
              Originally posted by BoxingIsGreat
              This fight doesn't even move the needle for me. If Spence wins, he beat old as dirt Pacman. If Pac wins, Spence is damaged goods. Either way, it's a useless fight. I can't understand the intrigue at all.

              Nothing special.
              Yup, the number 1 ww fighting the greatest active fighter today is no reason for people to be intrigued at all.

              Sounds like you don't even like boxing.

              Comment

              • hugh grant
                Undisputed Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Apr 2006
                • 30642
                • 2,220
                • 940
                • 105,596

                #47
                Originally posted by Ryannn

                Yup, the number 1 ww fighting the greatest active fighter today is no reason for people to be intrigued at all.

                Sounds like you don't even like boxing.
                Exactly, boxing is a dangerous sport where you can get hurt and it's a young man's game. So people who don't want to give pac credit are as su****ious as heck. You are on a hiding to nothing if you outstay your welcome in boxing and longer than God wants you to and they want to downplay what PACs doing? I give up sometimes.
                Last edited by hugh grant; 07-28-2021, 09:05 AM.

                Comment

                • IronDanHamza
                  BoxingScene Icon
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Oct 2009
                  • 50001
                  • 5,149
                  • 270
                  • 104,043

                  #48
                  Originally posted by -Kev-

                  I’m about to wikipedia your ass Iron. You should know this as a history buff.

                  “Manny Pacquiao is the first and only fighter in the history of boxing who is credited with lineal championships in five different weight classes (flyweight, featherweight, super featherweight, light welterweight and welterweight) by Cyber Boxing Zone, TBRB and BoxingScene.com.”
                  I don’t care what Wikipedia, CBZ, or TBRB say.

                  Pacquaio has never been Lineal Champion at 147.

                  He apparently claimed it by beating Bradley, who was 2-1-1 in his last 4, and Pacquaio himself was coming off a loss. When a new Lineal Champion is crowned from a vacant perspective, it is when it’s the universal #1 and #2 fight.

                  There is no way anyone can logically claim that that was the case there, Pacquaio was coming off a loss for crying out loud.

                  Regardless, even if he was Lineal Champion at 147 (he wasn’t) this fight between him and Spence is definitely not to crown a new Lineal.

                  That would be even more illogical than making the winner of Pacquaio-Bradley 3 for the Lineage.

                  The Lineage at 147 has been vacant since Mayweather retired. A new Lineal Champion will be crowned when Errol Spence and Terrance Crawford ever decide to fight each other.

                  Simple as that.

                  Comment

                  • STREET CLEANER
                    The Watcher
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Feb 2010
                    • 19637
                    • 4,826
                    • 4,415
                    • 298,225

                    #49
                    The biggest win would had been against Floyd where he got dominated. Indeed it would be a huge accomplishment if he beats Spence with no doubts but the fight still has not happened.

                    Comment

                    • -Kev-
                      this is boxing
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Dec 2006
                      • 39960
                      • 5,045
                      • 1,449
                      • 234,543

                      #50
                      Originally posted by IronDanHamza

                      I don’t care what Wikipedia, CBZ, or TBRB say.

                      Pacquaio has never been Lineal Champion at 147.

                      He apparently claimed it by beating Bradley, who was 2-1-1 in his last 4, and Pacquaio himself was coming off a loss. When a new Lineal Champion is crowned from a vacant perspective, it is when it’s the universal #1 and #2 fight.

                      There is no way anyone can logically claim that that was the case there, Pacquaio was coming off a loss for crying out loud.

                      Regardless, even if he was Lineal Champion at 147 (he wasn’t) this fight between him and Spence is definitely not to crown a new Lineal.

                      That would be even more illogical than making the winner of Pacquaio-Bradley 3 for the Lineage.

                      The Lineage at 147 has been vacant since Mayweather retired. A new Lineal Champion will be crowned when Errol Spence and Terrance Crawford ever decide to fight each other.

                      Simple as that.
                      But you have used Cyber Boxing Zone before. I’ve seen you. If the shoe fits…

                      So the IronDanHamza Boxing publication says he wasn’t lineal champion, so he wasn’t lineal champion. Just an opinion. Not even facts. I thought we were discussing facts.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP