Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

So if Floyd simply destroys JMM, does he have the upper hand on Pacquiao?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by JM1 View Post
    good thing you know. would you give pac credit if humberto soto moves up from 130 to 140 to fight pac and pac beats him? as a pac fan, i wont. how about you?
    I don't really care, he has been away for 2 years anyway... I don't expect him to jump straight in there with Mosley or Pacquiao or Cotto... its people like you that keep going on about it.

    Every day, "Floyd a ***** picking on a Lightweight" then I see people like you jumping in there complaining, you do more talking about him than his fans.

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by Klitschko2010 View Post
      Probably the worst post I have ever read. WW was Oscar's best weight? Well, perhaps in 1999 but not 2009.
      DLH looked the best he had in years against Forbes at 150, hell he even fought 12 full rounds. 6 months later he's the weight drained zombie at 147?

      DLH went to 154 and 160 to make history and stayed at 154 when he was older, because he was too lazy to make 47. Look how good Jones looked at 170, even though he hadn't made that weight in over a decade.

      Worst post you've ever read? Don't you proof read your own?

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by Spacey1991 View Post
        I don't really care, he has been away for 2 years anyway... I don't expect him to jump straight in there with Mosley or Pacquiao or Cotto... its people like you that keep going on about it.

        Every day, "Floyd a ***** picking on a Lightweight" then I see people like you jumping in there complaining, you do more talking about him than his fans.
        what can you do then? oscar took all the critism when he chose to fight pac and now floyd is doing the same thing and his **** riders dont want him to get critized?

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by Ishy Aytan View Post
          Of course the Pac fans will argue that Pac beat him at his very best weight. But this is the same arguement that the Floyd fans use when questioning Pacs victories over Oscar.

          Floyd and his fans argue that he beat him at 154, his very best weight. But after Pac beat Oscar and Hatton, apparently Floyds credentials went down because Pac did a better job on both of them than him.

          But can Floyd use the same arguement if he destroys JMM? Obviously people will critisize the victory, but is it right for people to go crazy over Pacs victory over Oscar, in which he was clearly weight drained and for those who dont believe he was they should compare the photos from the pac weigh in to another at any fight at 154.

          Now my question is, will Floyd's credentials over Pac increase if Floyd beats or destroys JMM?

          Tony Tucker>Buster Douglas> Mike Tyson>Tucker

          Forrest > Mosley>Mayorga>Forrest

          Comment


          • #25
            And I wernt talkin about a hypethitical match between pac-floyd, I was talking bout legacy why's.

            If floyd destroys jmm does he dent pacs win over jmm like many people said pac dented floyds resume.

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by Ishy Aytan View Post
              And I wernt talkin about a hypethitical match between pac-floyd, I was talking bout legacy why's.

              If floyd destroys jmm does he dent pacs win over jmm like many people said pac dented floyds resume.
              Pac didn't dent Floyd's resume

              Floyd fought the better version of Oscar, *******s are delusional if they think that Pacquiao fought the better version

              If thats the case then Floyd is fighting the best version of JMM

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by JM1 View Post
                what can you do then? oscar took all the critism when he chose to fight pac and now floyd is doing the same thing and his **** riders dont want him to get critized?

                I am just sick of hearing the same **** every day, I would rather have a new topic to talk about... yeah go use those tissues, cause your the one who is bitching and crying about the fight constantly.

                The annoying thing is too... you try to make new topics to talk about, and nobody is interested.

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by Ishy Aytan View Post
                  And I wernt talkin about a hypethitical match between pac-floyd, I was talking bout legacy why's.

                  If floyd destroys jmm does he dent pacs win over jmm like many people said pac dented floyds resume.

                  Styles make fights.

                  Look what Pac did to Hatton.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by Ishy Aytan View Post
                    Of course the Pac fans will argue that Pac beat him at his very best weight. But this is the same arguement that the Floyd fans use when questioning Pacs victories over Oscar.

                    Floyd and his fans argue that he beat him at 154, his very best weight. But after Pac beat Oscar and Hatton, apparently Floyds credentials went down because Pac did a better job on both of them than him.

                    But can Floyd use the same arguement if he destroys JMM? Obviously people will critisize the victory, but is it right for people to go crazy over Pacs victory over Oscar, in which he was clearly weight drained and for those who dont believe he was they should compare the photos from the pac weigh in to another at any fight at 154.

                    Now my question is, will Floyd's credentials over Pac increase if Floyd beats or destroys JMM?
                    No arguement there.

                    Floyd made Hatton come up to WW, a division Hatton had no business in, while Pacquiao destroyed Hatton in Hatton's kingdom of 140lbs...where HE WAS KING. Hatton was not "shot" when Pacquiao fought him...after the Paulie fight, all everyone was talking about was "Aww ****..he's back".

                    No he can not. He made a LW come up to WW to fight him...he holds all the advantages and factors in his favor. Would you give DLH credit for beating Marquez? Since everyone is saying their "80yr old grandma could've beat DLH that night"...let's place JMM in Pac's place. I don't think Marquez could've made DLH **** on his stool that night.

                    Anyone in their right minds knows this already...if they are denying it...they are a true Pac-Tard

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by Jim Jeffries View Post
                      DLH looked the best he had in years against Forbes at 150, hell he even fought 12 full rounds. 6 months later he's the weight drained zombie at 147?
                      DLH went to 154 and 160 to make history and stayed at 154 when he was older, because he was too lazy to make 47. Look how good Jones looked at 170, even though he hadn't made that weight in over a decade.

                      Worst post you've ever read? Don't you proof read your own?
                      I dam near fell out of my seat when I read that.....

                      Reason why Oscar went so low in weight....he thought it would increase his speed...which was Manny's biggest asset in that fight....but it drained more than just his weight...his heart.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP