So if Floyd simply destroys JMM, does he have the upper hand on Pacquiao?

[lee majors]

Welp, it won't take Floyd 5-6 plus years with a rubbermatch to whoop JMM's ass decisively . That pretty much says it all.

[UnDeniable]

they wont give floyd the credit he deserves..but in the same breath they'll say pacman can beat floyd

Who gives a **** if people think Pac can beat Floyd, as long as Vegas makes Pac the favourite is all thats important

Floyd as an underdog would be interesting

[Ishy Aytan]

WW was Oscar's best weight, if I'm not mistaken. He looked very good at 150 months prior. Not Pac's fault he didn't rehydrate (though he did have IV marks) enough afterward.

So was Oscar drained when he fought Pac or not?

[Jim Jeffries]

So was Oscar drained when he fought Pac or not?

Reading comprehension not one of your strong suits?

[2501]

And i dont remember me saying Pac didnt fight Hatton at Hattons best weight. Read it again and you'll find that i'm talking about Oscar.

Did Pac fight Oscar at Oscars best weight???????????????????????

But yet you include Hatton in the argument....

Floyd and his fans argue that he beat him at 154, his very best weight. But after Pac beat Oscar and Hatton, apparently Floyds credentials went down because Pac did a better job on both of them than him.

So why don't we review this then

PBF and Pac will have fought 3 common opponents, DLH, Hatton and JMM

PBF fought DLH at his "best weight", but made Hatton AND JMM come out of THEIR best weight.

Pac fought DLH @ 147 making him come down from 154, but at the same time going UP in weight. Pac also fought Hatton at 140 which is Hatton's best weight and fought JMM at HIS best weight.

So even if you remove DLH from Pac's victories, Pac would have still fought 2 common opponents at their best weight.

But I'm sure you guys will find a way to spin that too.

[Pullcounter]

Of course the Pac fans will argue that Pac beat him at his very best weight. But this is the same arguement that the Floyd fans use when questioning Pacs victories over Oscar.

Floyd and his fans argue that he beat him at 154, his very best weight. But after Pac beat Oscar and Hatton, apparently Floyds credentials went down because Pac did a better job on both of them than him.

But can Floyd use the same arguement if he destroys JMM? Obviously people will critisize the victory, but is it right for people to go crazy over Pacs victory over Oscar, in which he was clearly weight drained and for those who dont believe he was they should compare the photos from the pac weigh in to another at any fight at 154.

Now my question is, will Floyd's credentials over Pac increase if Floyd beats or destroys JMM?

no JMM is a midget / tune up for floyd. floyd is supposed to smash jmm into tiny bits.

[Klitschko2010]

WW was Oscar's best weight, if I'm not mistaken. He looked very good at 150 months prior. Not Pac's fault he didn't rehydrate (though he did have IV marks) enough afterward.

Probably the worst post I have ever read. WW was Oscar's best weight? Well, perhaps in 1999 but not 2009.

[JM1]

they wont give floyd the credit he deserves..but in the same breath they'll say pacman can beat floyd

good thing you know. would you give pac credit if humberto soto moves up from 130 to 140 to fight pac and pac beats him? as a pac fan, i wont. how about you?

[Spacey1991]

Styles make fights, you can't judge a fight based on fighter A beating fighter B more convincingly than fighter C, so fighter A beats fighter C... it doesn't work like that.

[SirTomJones]

of course. floyd is gonna look good.