I don't understand why its so hard for these guys to just accept the prime fighters Floyd beat. Its a pretty good list. Is it trumping Ali and the Sugar Rays, no, but its a decent list that could have been far better had he fought the best guys in their prime.
They live in a bubble my friend. Living in their make believe world where in Floyd seats in a throne. Nothing he does is wrong. That's why it's fun bursting that bubble of fake reality they love to live in.
Dude we not talking about Manny's best wins we talking about Floyd's.
Time and memorial we use who they beat and when they beat them as the measuring stick.
Until Floyd Boys came along....
What can be more simple than the parameters given.
Oh well.
Here you go. Everybody that was prime when Floyd beat them:
Hernandez
Alvarez
Hatton
Ortiz
Guerrero
Chop Chop Corley
Corrales
Marcos Madonna 2X
Zab Judah
Carlos Baldimir
Eh I will throw in Castillo 2X
Manfredy
Conor McGregor
We know whatever 5 you choose isn't putting him in the top 10 atg category, but now pick 5 and stfu.
Looks like Big Dunn.. ran again.. Let's give him a chance to pick on those prime fighters Floyd fought.
If He doesn't show up.. I guess you get another TKO win..
They live in a bubble my friend. Living in their make believe world where in Floyd seats in a throne. Nothing he does is wrong. That's why it's fun bursting that bubble of fake reality they love to live in.
I mean he's one of the greatest fighters of all time and he's definitely top 2 in his era. Not sure what your point with all of this is. You can literally pick apart every fighters resume the same way. She was the last time Pacquiao fought a prime elite champion?
You can’t fight guys in their prime when they have a toothache, are scared of needles, or will not take $40 mil.
This is not a rocket science and we can base this on the boxing experts opinion on who's ducking who.
bhops, mcgirt, garcia's, whyte, chavez sr. and other boxing legends are all in agreement saying "pac fought everyone put in front of him while floyd only fought guys under his watch/terms"
it's not that hard to figure out isn't it?
There's a lot of evidence and there's a lot of video that even floyd admitted it but we base this on the opinion of respected people who isn't bias.
This is not a rocket science and we can base this on the boxing experts opinion on who's ducking who.
bhops, mcgirt, garcia's, whyte, chavez sr. and other boxing legends are all in agreement saying "pac fought everyone put in front of him while floyd only fought guys under his watch/terms"
it's not that hard to figure out isn't it?
There's a lot of evidence and there's a lot of video that even floyd admitted it but we base this on the opinion of respected people who isn't bias.
Yup, at this point in time. Only a Fl0mo will say Pac is ducking anyone in his career. The guy fought everyone even a prime fighter and still is even in the old age of 42. That's all there is to it. The guy is a warrior a true OG who fights anybody who is a threat.
I mean he's one of the greatest fighters of all time and he's definitely top 2 in his era. Not sure what your point with all of this is. You can literally pick apart every fighters resume the same way. She was the last time Pacquiao fought a prime elite champion?
Exactly, every boxing fan can pic apart every fighters resume.. Like fine wine.. only the pure g****s that is filtered from the barrel is what is left.. to find the true essence of a fighter to see his real weight in history.
After all, A fighter is only as good as his resume'
I'm not going to be arguing here with you in a back and forth.. I'm just enjoying my fellow boxing fans who get it do it for me, as I applaud in the sidelines..
That said.. 50-0 is Floyd's record..
that 50th win against Mc Gregor an 0-0 fighter. Is that even a worthy opponent to be in his record? Nope, it isn't. A true boxing fan will say it's not much substance at all.. Mc Gregor isn't even a boxer for crying out loud..
How about Berto? Yeessh.. Pacquiao? Fought a one armed healthy fighter and still gave a huggathon event after the dismay of the world to see. Not really much to say of a legit win.. It only shows he can't even dance with an Injured Pacquiao that even if he was the bigger man who was caught amped up with IV power, he still had to run and hug for 12 shameful rounds.. not much in that win as well.. Not to mention half of the world saw Floyd lose.. Too watered down to really make an impact at all..
Marquez? - The guy was a small lightweight jumping 2 weight classes, to fight Floyd a true welterweight at that time.. What does Floyd do? He cheated in the scales and didn't even commit to the gentleman's agreement not to go over 144 lbs, as he went 3 lbs over the agreed weight limit. That alone is just watered down unfair advantage.. Making a small man even more handicapped..
SO what's the point? What is left in Floyd's resume'?
What's left is the prime fighters he fought. That's what Floyd comes down to..
Is it really much to say?
Not really? Like Pasawayako mentioned.. his resume is more like a Crawford resume.. Nothing really shines through..
Everybody that was prime when Floyd beat them:
Not really much to see here..
Hernandez
Alvarez
Hatton
Ortiz
Guerrero
Chop Chop Corley
Corrales
Marcos Madonna 2X (Maidana arguably won the first)
Zab Judah
Carlos Baldimir
Castillo 2X (Castillo arguably won the first)
Manfredy
Conor McGregor
1.Pacquiao is his best win.
2.De La Hoya was still very good when Floyd beat him.
3.Cotto still pretty decent.
4.Castillo was a very good win.
Get’s iffy from here. Green Canelo, Jesus Chavez, I find it very difficult to rate Corrales high since I know he was dead from the weight. Judah was a good win too, I’d put around with beating Maidana at 37.
I’ll say:
5.Jesus Chavez, He was a solid (and crazy) fighter.
Corrales fought at that same weight for two more years and won another belt at the weight. So that excuse won't cut it.
Comment