Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Fury's Father Tears Apart Wilder, Offers Job To Breland

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    Originally posted by davefromvancouv View Post

    Deontay Wilder is the real deal. I believe him over anybody else in boxing right now. He showed you compelling evidence why he believes he was cheated. The other side provided no rebuttal other than to deny it. They're also acting like a guilty party, doing everything they can to avoid Wilder. But the arbitration case is still ongoing.

    Frank Warren confirmed it two weeks ago:
    https://www.skysports.com/boxing/new...not-be-delayed
    I honestly envy you in a way... your complete blind faith in someone is admirable.

    That said... even in that article you posted about the arbitration there was a piece of text that illustrates that they don't believe that the case with Wilder will stop Fury v Joshua happening:

    "We don't believe it will affect the fight," Warren told Sky Sports.

    If they don't believe that the Wilder issue will stop the fight then they would be foolish to go back and give Wilder the third fight when there is so much more money to be made in a unification fight with Joshua.

    They're also definitely not acting like a guilty party... that's only your view with your very rose tinted glasses. Most objective people can see that Wilder has slung so much **** at Fury that it's perfectly reasonable for Fury to go "you know what, **** you" and walk away from fighting Wilder. You can argue that what better way to settle things than in the ring but that's equally not true... Fury has already completely decimated Wilder in the ring and as such relegating him to sitting on the sidelines looking in whilst the big fights happen without Wilder would be far, far more damaging to Wilder and his ego than simply knocking Wilder out again.
    REDEEMER REDEEMER likes this.

    Comment


    • #82
      Originally posted by davefromvancouv View Post

      Deontay Wilder is the real deal. I believe him over anybody else in boxing right now. He showed you compelling evidence why he believes he was cheated. The other side provided no rebuttal other than to deny it. They're also acting like a guilty party, doing everything they can to avoid Wilder. But the arbitration case is still ongoing.

      Frank Warren confirmed it two weeks ago:
      https://www.skysports.com/boxing/new...not-be-delayed
      Wilder has zero evidence that he was cheated. The only compelling evidence he showed us is evidence of his own weak character and lack of integrity.

      Comment


      • #83
        Originally posted by kafkod View Post

        Wilder has zero evidence that he was cheated. The only compelling evidence he showed us is evidence of his own weak character and lack of integrity.
        Of course he has evidence. And it's credible too. That's why you're attacking the messenger and not the message.

        Comment


        • #84
          Originally posted by davefromvancouv View Post

          Of course he has evidence. And it's credible too. That's why you're attacking the messenger and not the message.

          You need to get smarter people in here if you are the messenger . All you did was repeat yourself and what you repeated is nonsense .

          Comment


          • #85
            Originally posted by REDEEMER View Post


            You need to get smarter people in here if you are the messenger . All you did was repeat yourself and what you repeated is nonsense .
            Says the person who proves my point and attacks the messenger.

            Comment


            • #86
              Originally posted by Deus View Post

              I honestly envy you in a way... your complete blind faith in someone is admirable.

              That said... even in that article you posted about the arbitration there was a piece of text that illustrates that they don't believe that the case with Wilder will stop Fury v Joshua happening:

              "We don't believe it will affect the fight," Warren told Sky Sports.

              If they don't believe that the Wilder issue will stop the fight then they would be foolish to go back and give Wilder the third fight when there is so much more money to be made in a unification fight with Joshua.

              They're also definitely not acting like a guilty party... that's only your view with your very rose tinted glasses. Most objective people can see that Wilder has slung so much **** at Fury that it's perfectly reasonable for Fury to go "you know what, **** you" and walk away from fighting Wilder. You can argue that what better way to settle things than in the ring but that's equally not true... Fury has already completely decimated Wilder in the ring and as such relegating him to sitting on the sidelines looking in whilst the big fights happen without Wilder would be far, far more damaging to Wilder and his ego than simply knocking Wilder out again.
              Real recognizes real. It's as simple as that.

              Wilder will be fine with or without Fury. But Fury needs to face his demons, honor the contract and win a title in a fair fight. No more gimmicks. No more controversy. And the stigma of the Klitschko fight will be over...

              Comment


              • #87
                Originally posted by davefromvancouv View Post

                Yes I remember him saying the exact same thing 2 months ago. Very knowledgable...
                https://*************/watch?v=c8Qo4rdq9N0
                And Arum says the same as Warren and Hearn. It's basically all agreed.

                Comment


                • #88
                  These fkking threads are mental yet haven't we noticed they go nowhere.

                  Fury cheated in a number of ways and there is proof. NO CHARGES HAVE BEEN BROUGHT TO FURY. NOTHING HAS HAPPENED, FURY IS THE WBC CHAMP.

                  Breland drugged him, they got proof. NO CHARGES HAVE BEEN BROUGHT TO BRELAND. NO PROOF HAS BEEN SHOWN.

                  Wilder had a dent in his head. They have a doctor and x-rays to prove it. IT'S BEEN OVER A YEAR NOW AND WE HAVE SEEN JACK CHIT REGARDING ANY OF THAT. (although anybody who believed a word of it in the 1st place is a massive fkking moron)

                  Fury can't fight Joshua cuz of Arbitration, he will be forced to face Wilder again. FURY V AJ IS NEARLY SETTLED AND WILDER HAS ALREADY VEN TALING ABOUT WHO HE MIGHT FIGHT NEXT.

                  These Wilder goons keep bleeting but all they say, and I mean ALL, Turns out to be false.

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    Originally posted by davefromvancouv View Post

                    Real recognizes real. It's as simple as that.

                    Wilder will be fine with or without Fury. But Fury needs to face his demons, honor the contract and win a title in a fair fight. No more gimmicks. No more controversy. And the stigma of the Klitschko fight will be over...
                    Weren't they talking about Wilder possibly fighting Charles Martin? Is that what you're calling 'will be fine'? Charles Martin. If Fury v Joshua happens and with all the mandatories due after that it will literally be years before Wilder can position himself to get a title shot again... he isn't getting any younger so no I certainly don't think he will be fine. I'd say that if he doesn't get the third fight with Fury his career his done and all he'll do is keep fighting under the PBC banner against PBC goons to milk a little extra cash off of his sheep.

                    Also... there was literally no controversy in the second fight between Wilder and Fury. Sure some people made up some controversy after the fight but it's been over a year now and at no point has anything come to light other than Wilder throwing out a multitude of excuses conspiracy theories with absolutely nothing to back it up. It's just baseless rubbish that only his followers believe because anybody that is objective would simply expect to have seen some kind of proof by now.
                    Last edited by Deus; 03-03-2021, 02:04 PM.

                    Comment


                    • #90
                      Originally posted by davefromvancouv View Post

                      Of course he has evidence. And it's credible too. That's why you're attacking the messenger and not the message.
                      Where is this evidence?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP