Originally posted by Shadow boxer 3
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Cotto Does Not Agree With The WBO's Weight Stance
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by ThunderWolf View PostThese are very grave errors. Let me correct you that both fighters have not signed the contracts. Both only received drafts of the contract, and Arum formally informed the public and media on the match prematurely without informing the Pacquiao Camp, which drew the ire of its lawyers.
One simple solution for Pacquiao is simply not sign. What would he gain if this would be just an exhibition match, not a championship match, yet he would be fighting a champion at the 141-147 division? What would he gain if he establishes a very very hard victory yet people smear his victory just because its the maximum that he can do against a very tough and unusually heavy opponent at fight night?
I advise Pacquiao to simply not sign and just fight Berto at 147 for a crown. Would Cotto and his fans complain? Oh, yes they will. But Pac and his fans don`t really need him.
That`s when the real crying starts, ask PBF who could have had the honor and chance to fight and defeat a P4P champ outright but blew it.
Arum is in a tough spot and Cotto has a lot of clout in the situation. Cotto can say **** it and leave, go to Golden Boy and get PBF. Cotto will be missing out on a big payday but he will have his pride and principles intact knowing he wasnt bullied around.
Solution- Fight at 147 for Cottos belt. Everyones happy.Last edited by Xcusemymood; 08-07-2009, 02:38 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by datu puti View Postfirst of all, i'm filipino and a diehard pacquiao fan (to some of you haters a pac nuthugger) but i have to side with cotto's camp for dis*****g the catchweight if their gonna fight for his title. It about the principal here not about the ****in contract. If pacquiao wants to win his 7th division title, then cotto should be allowed to weigh in at the welterweight limit of 147lbs. I have to tell the truth and not be biased. Let's not be hyprocrites here people, cause if it was the other way around pacquiao would do the same thing. Besides, i think pacquiao has a chance of beating cotto even if he weighed in at 147lbs, plus all the pacquiao haters won't be ****in makin ****** ass excuses on why cotto lost the fight. Bottomline personal pride aside, if the belt is on the line then cotto should be allowed to weigh in at the welterweight limit of 147lbs. Anyway you look at it people, if you challenge a champion in a certain division for the belt, that defending champion should be able to weigh in at the max limit, which in this case 147lbs.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jetgeomcx View Postthe most beatable and the on e who offers most $$$.
makes sense, mi amigo!!
try to put your feet in manny/freddie's shoes.
but roach wanted floyd the most...not anybody else!!
haven't you read that piece on freddie??
Comment
-
Originally posted by jetgeomcx View Postfriend, here's a list of title fyts done in catchwts...courtesy of friend GetSumBrah...thanks brah!
- whitaker vs cesar chavez for welter title @ 145lbs
- ray leonard vs danny lalonde for the super middle & lightheavy title under 175 & 168. @ 165lbs
- ray leonard vs tommy hearns 2 for the super middleweight title @ 163
- oscar hoya vs bernard hopkins for the middleweight championship @ 158lbs
- terry norris vs meldrick taylor for the juniormiddle belt @ 150lbs
only famous fyters, like pacman, can get away with catchwt in title fyt.
Comment
-
Originally posted by civicvx View PostI don't get it, some of you guys swear like Cotto was force to fight at 145. Pacquiao was searching for a fight and Cotto whisper out that if they meet up at 145 and no less Cotto would not have a problem. Now the fight is being made and Cotto seems to have a problem putting is belt on the line. Any where from 141-147 is welter, Cotto said 145 is good enough.
'
Comment
-
Originally posted by Shadow boxer 3 View Postif theres no point in fightin cotto without the title than pac should go fight someone else. Mosley is more than willing to put his belt on the line.
but then there is no logical point for cotto not to agree....except for his "pride".
well....let's see if cotto will not eat his own "pride" chicken!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by animalavenue View PostBut then I see you hating on Floyd for it all the time?
but then it's not really hate per se....
i just want to bash his sorry ass for all his trash talking and innuendoes.
i admire floyd for his boxing skills...he is very talented.
i just ...oh well. peace brah....
i am a very logical pacfan....
i just argue about the merits of opinion being posted.
i hope the day will come when we see manny-floyd.
i won't cry a river if floyd wins.....i guess that is expected as of now.
but then again roach said floyd is the easiest fyt for manny out there....i don't know.
let's wait how manny will perform against cotto....
Comment
-
Originally posted by rommel357 View PostI think that's the whole main problem, i don't think they really had finalized the deal yet, and Arum prematurely announced the fight right away. I'm almost sure Manny and his camp did not agree for a non-title fight, because again, there is no point and there's nothing for Manny to gain without the title.
there is no signed contract yet.....
arum made a draft contract,...a proposal.
he showed it to cotto for initial discussion....
cotto agreed on the terms after his discussion with arum.
arum gave the proposal to team pacquiao for their perusal.
and now both parties are negotiating.
there were some posts that manny already agreed verbally that COTTO'S belt is not at stake.
nobody in manny's camp is saying about this "agree to no belt at stake" issue.
and now they want the belt to be on the line...BUT OF COURSE!
what for manny fyts cotto if the history-making 7th belt is not on the line????
manny will fyt for the belt from hereon....not necessarily cotto's.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jetgeomcx View Postthat's just it!!
there is no signed contract yet.....
arum made a draft contract,...a proposal.
he showed it to cotto for initial discussion....
cotto agreed on the terms after his discussion with arum.
arum gave the proposal to team pacquiao for their perusal.
and now both parties are negotiating.
there were some posts that manny already agreed verbally that COTTO'S belt is not at stake.
nobody in manny's camp is saying about this "agree to no belt at stake" issue.
and now they want the belt to be on the line...BUT OF COURSE!
what for manny fyts cotto if the history-making 7th belt is not on the line????
manny will fyt for the belt from hereon....not necessarily cotto's.
manny is fighting cotto.... on nov 14.... not anybody else.. even if the contracts arent signed yet.... u can bet that those guys are fighting on nov 14...
im so sure about this.. that im willing to give you 2:1 all your points that the fight gets done...
Comment
Comment