Originally posted by jetgeomcx
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Roach: "Pacquiao Doesn't Need Cotto Without The Belt"
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by dans01234 View PostThere is a difference. Not that I want to fuel the Pachuggers fire, but it's the welterweight LIMIT. Just like the middleweight LIMIT. Fighters can always come in under the limit, just not over.
Is it even legal to fight for a belt over the weight LIMIT? Anyone?
Comment
-
Originally posted by boxingfan76 View PostI HAVE NOT CLAIMED TO BE BETTER THAN ANY MAGAZINE JUST CALLING ******* FANS OUT on all your bull**** you post.
Comment
-
Originally posted by boxingfan76 View PostIF PACYA SO SECURE AND CONFIDENT WHY DID HE SHAMLESSLEY AND VERY PUBLICLY DUCK MOSLEY HMMmmm????????even at 140!!!!! or even jmm on his own turf??? manny he dont want none .only guys he can easily beat so you shouldnt boast about feeling secure.pacya isnt billy badass, a lot of what he is has to do with the media.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Motofan View PostIf you want history at all costs Freddy, make the fight at 147. Good to see the vast majority of people on here standing by Cotto, fans or not.
And by the way, this thread is insane. PBF, cant wait for your weak ass PPV numbers.
Comment
-
legitimacy and legacy
i agree that if we want legacy from manny he should fyt at legit ww limit.
alibis and criticisms, even doubts, will not stop if he wins the belt at 145.
all praises and props will come manny's way whether he wins or loses against a legit welter in cotto.
this will be a bigger risk for manny...but legitimacy of title equates better with legacy.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Iceta View PostBut I'm not even convinced that Pacquiao is getting more money for a Cotto fight, because Cotto didn't just come out and flat out say that he would take less money than Pacquiao like Mosley did when the negotiation process of this fight started.
And Cotto is reportedly getting around 35% anyway.
Comment
Comment