Lightweight Mayweather fighting 6 foot Welterweight Diego Corrales

[WhoreUs]

Oscar's resume at 154(wins only): Mosley*(He won that fight, Mosley also cheated in that fight). Mayorga, Vargas

Mosley's resume at 154: Vargas x2

How is Mosley at 154 better than Oscar at 154

did i say mosley's resume at 154 is better than oscar?

don't try to change the subject , moron.

i just think mosley was a better fighter at 154 at the time (early 2007) than oscar.

mosley had back to back wins over top 10 ranked vargas a few months earlier.

oscar had ONE fight at 154 the last 3-4 years.

[boxing_pundit85]

Funny how no one had a problem with this fight and everyone had no problem picking Mayweather to lose.

5 knockdowns later and Corrales' corner waving the white towel, we were witnesses to greatness.

not only a great point, but a great illustration of the point. unfortuntely, it will fall on deaf ears, as logic is not a means to sway anyone's views on nsb......people who respect floyd already know this, and people who dont will just resort back to the typical "hater speak" he ducked cotto/margorito/jesus/tyson/and prolly gonna get on his case for not taking out hitler in ww2 at some point, despite not being born.....PBF ducked hitler!

[WhoreUs]

For argument's sake, lets say youre right. Floyd had already signed to fight Zab before he lost, Zab was number one at the time, the way Zab lost(he was winning rather easily until one punch hurt him and he wasnt able to recover/get his legs back for a long time) and the fact that Zab in many eyes even with the loss was still better than Baldomir. Floyd said he viewed that as a draw when he saw the fight.

Anyway since the fight was already signed, you and many seem to think had Zab beat Baldy it would have changed the outcome of the Floyd fight? Basically not giving the Zab fight full credit seems to make one wonder this.

am i ****ting on floyd for fighting zab?

don't confuse me with other floyd haters.

didn't i say zab was a good win and it would have been a great win if zab didn't lay an egg in the baldo fight?

this is why floyd stans are as bad as pac haks.

[WhoreUs]

So after Floyd beats Marquez where do you think he will be rated since one fight doesnt seem to do it for you.

probably #3 behind cotto and mosley.

#2 if cotto loses to clottey.

don't compare floyd to oscar.

floyd has been gone barely a year. oscar left 154 3-4 years before the mayorga fight.

[Little Killer]

did i say mosley's resume at 154 is better than oscar?

don't try to change the subject , moron.

i just think mosley was a better fighter at 154 at the time (early 2007) than oscar.

mosley had back to back wins over top 10 ranked vargas a few months earlier.

oscar had ONE fight at 154 the last 3-4 years.

Mosley beat Vargas. The same Vargas who ass was handed to him by Oscar at 154. So what Oscar had a break. His win over Mayorga was impressive. Oscar didn't show any signs of real decline against Floyd. He was fast as hell in the fight. He stopped throwing the jab after he realized Floyd was to quick

The only reason you think Mosley would have be better is because of his win against Margarito.

[Little Killer]

am i ****ting on floyd for fighting zab?

don't confuse me with other floyd haters.

didn't i say zab was a good win and it would have been a great win if zab didn't lay an egg in the baldo fight?

this is why floyd stans are as bad as pac haks.

You are known as one of the biggest Floyd haters on these forums. Stop and trying to act innocent

[Bhopreign]

am i ****ting on floyd for fighting zab?

don't confuse me with other floyd haters.

didn't i say zab was a good win and it would have been a great win if zab didn't lay an egg in the baldo fight?

this is why floyd stans are as bad as pac haks.

The point Im trying to make is that because a guy loses doesnt automatically make a win good instead of great.

[WhoreUs]

You are known as one of the biggest Floyd haters on these forums. Stop and trying to act innocent

i am.

i'm not denying it.

i'm just telling him not to confuse me with the other floyd haters.

i don't say the same **** as them. some but not all.

[WhoreUs]

The point Im trying to make is that because a guy loses doesnt automatically make a win good instead of great.

yes it does.

if zab hadn't lost , floyd would have beaten the #1 guy and lineal and undisputed champion of 147.

since he lost he was no longer the #1 guy nor lineal or undisputed champion.

see the difference?

that's why i said zab was a GOOD win but would have been a GREAT win if he hadn't lost to baldomir.

[Bhopreign]

yes it does.

if zab hadn't lost , floyd would have beaten the #1 guy and lineal and undisputed champion of 147.

since he lost he was no longer the #1 guy nor lineal or undisputed champion.

see the difference?

that's why i said zab was a GOOD win but would have been a GREAT win if he hadn't lost to baldomir.

Now that kinda sounds like someone who doesnt follow the sport closely, so had Zab won every round and retired at 2:59 of the 12 round due to heat exhaustion I guess you would still feel the same way. So was Baldomir a great win since Floyd beat the "lineal welterweight champion of the world?"