Lightweight Mayweather fighting 6 foot Welterweight Diego Corrales

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • The_Demon
    Big dog
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jan 2009
    • 13603
    • 1,354
    • 888
    • 22,971

    #51
    floyd was something else at lightweight

    Comment

    • TEDetc
      Banned
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Jul 2008
      • 712
      • 59
      • 21
      • 878

      #52
      Originally posted by Mr._Pink
      he was the #1 guy at 154 by ring magazine in 2006.

      they bumped him off right before the oscar-floyd fight because he fought collazo at 147.
      So you admit Shane wasn't no.1 at 154 when Floyd fought Oscar. All I needed to hear.

      Comment

      • Little Killer
        Banned
        • May 2009
        • 743
        • 67
        • 2
        • 977

        #53
        Originally posted by Mr._Pink
        he was the #1 guy at 154 by ring magazine in 2006.

        they bumped him off right before the oscar-floyd fight because he fought collazo at 147.
        Then how was Mosley the best Jr MW at the time of PBF/Oscar when he fighting at WW

        Comment

        • Bhopreign
          Banned
          • Jun 2006
          • 11273
          • 419
          • 100
          • 12,036

          #54
          Originally posted by Mr._Pink
          i know he was a champ for beating mayorga (who won a vacant belt right before......yeah that wasn't set up) but he can't be #1 automatically by jumping into a new division. maybe for the boxing orgs but not for ring magazine which i'm using for my basis since it's the best reference for rankings.

          the only time guzman ever became the top ranked guy in his division that i can remember was 130.

          he got that because barrera , morales , marquez and pacquiao all left.

          maybe you're talking about being the #1 contender for a belt for one of the boxing orgs. that's common since if you're a champ at 1 weight and then move up they automatically make you a #1 challenger in the new weight class.
          Thats because the actual heritage was broken when Winky moved up, so champion status was vacant and has been, so who was ranked 1-5 then.

          Comment

          • Little Killer
            Banned
            • May 2009
            • 743
            • 67
            • 2
            • 977

            #55
            Originally posted by Mr._Pink
            are we talking about floyd or we talking about pacquiao?

            get off pacquiao's nuts ray. you talk about him more than i do and i'm a pachak.
            You said Judah was not a great win because he lost to Baldomir.

            Morales was not a great win for then since he lost to Raheem and never won a fight again.

            Hope you are not a hypocrite.

            Comment

            • WhoreUs
              Banned
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Oct 2008
              • 15770
              • 556
              • 606
              • 20,363

              #56
              Originally posted by Little Killer
              You are not smart at all. You are a Asian gangsta (as you claim) that is a right wing **********. Those people don't even accept your ass, pretty sad IMO.

              Baldomir beat Judah and become ring champion. Judah become number 2 because of his loss
              what does my politics have to do with anything?

              you're such a dumb**** sometimes , flaw.

              when you lose a fight you don't just go down 1 spot. wtf?

              so if you're no. 1 and you lose 1 time you get to be no. 2?

              what if you lose twice? you become no. 3?

              it doesn't work that way.

              zab lost to a guy ring ranked #10. that means zab lost to a guy that ring thought 9-10 other fighters were better than. if you just lost to a guy that ring considers not as good as 9-10 other guys , you don't stay the #2 man in the division!

              Comment

              • WhoreUs
                Banned
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Oct 2008
                • 15770
                • 556
                • 606
                • 20,363

                #57
                Originally posted by Little Killer
                You said Judah was not a great win because he lost to Baldomir.

                Morales was not a great win for then since he lost to Raheem and never won a fight again.

                Hope you are not a hypocrite.
                fine. morales was not a great win for pacquiao.

                again what does that have to do with floyd?

                Comment

                • TEDetc
                  Banned
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Jul 2008
                  • 712
                  • 59
                  • 21
                  • 878

                  #58
                  Originally posted by Mr._Pink
                  what does my politics have to do with anything?

                  you're such a dumb**** sometimes , flaw.

                  when you lose a fight you don't just go down 1 spot. wtf?

                  so if you're no. 1 and you lose 1 time you get to be no. 2?

                  what if you lose twice? you become no. 3?

                  it doesn't work that way.

                  zab lost to a guy ring ranked #10. that means zab lost to a guy that ring thought 9-10 other fighters were better than. if you just lost to a guy that ring considers not as good as 9-10 other guys , you don't stay the #2 man in the division!

                  That's not how the ring Magazine works.

                  Comment

                  • Mary Jane
                    Banned
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Feb 2009
                    • 1759
                    • 195
                    • 171
                    • 2,121

                    #59
                    Originally posted by Mr._Pink
                    what does my politics have to do with anything?

                    you're such a dumb**** sometimes , flaw.

                    when you lose a fight you don't just go down 1 spot. wtf?

                    so if you're no. 1 and you lose 1 time you get to be no. 2?

                    what if you lose twice? you become no. 3?

                    it doesn't work that way.

                    zab lost to a guy ring ranked #10. that means zab lost to a guy that ring thought 9-10 other fighters were better than. if you just lost to a guy that ring considers not as good as 9-10 other guys , you don't stay the #2 man in the division!
                    Cotto was #1 at 147, he dropped to #2 after the Margarito loss.

                    Comment

                    • Little Killer
                      Banned
                      • May 2009
                      • 743
                      • 67
                      • 2
                      • 977

                      #60
                      Originally posted by Mr._Pink
                      fine. morales was not a great win for pacquiao.

                      again what does that have to do with floyd?
                      Also subtract JMM since JMM should have gotten the nod.

                      Hence Pacman best wins are really Hatton and Barrera

                      Would you agree

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP