The RING: Pacman is this decade's best!

[Cadillac Man]

His resume and accomplishments speak for themselves! HANDS DOWN best fighter of the decade!

[pbftxrs316]

srl, hopkins, de la hoya, hatton, roy jones, mosley, paulie mag, and many other fighters themselves said floyd was the greatest fighter of his generation... what else had to be said...formeman said this also....the ring magazine's owner called floyd the best of his generation. nothing else needs to be said...thread over...

[sandyvahra]

That was what 2 years ago? Pac's come a long way in 2 years. To this point it's Pacman.

I think those fighters were referring to skill wise, and ill give him that with rj for the 90s.

[dde91]

Someone said that Floyd's record is padded. Have you seen Pac's? It is by far the most overrated resume in the history of boxing. He gets mad mad mad credit for doing things that he shouldnt. Like Raheem completey shuts out EM. No one had EM winning one round but Pac knocks him out in the next fight and everyone goes crazy like the Raheem fight never happened. Then they have the nerve to have a 3rd fight which people go crazy over again and never mind the fact that Pac made EM look like a boy in the ring. He was twice as big in the 2nd & 3rd fight as he was in the 1st. David Diaz? Maybe one of the worst champs ever. Oscar at WW with blood coming from the IV's in his arm where Pac weighed the exact same thing as him in the ring. Alot of people thought JMM won both fights. The 2nd MAB fight where MAB had done nothing to deserve it and was clearly as done as EM. Larios and all these guys past there prime and all coming off of recent losses.

All Pac has on his resume is names but none of the names matchup to the guys he fought. Nearly all of them were completely different guys when he fought them and all the good fighters were coming off of recent very bad losses when Pac beat them. Everyone credits him for moving up so much but who did he fight? He didnt fight nearly any big guys. He fought all guys that were also moving up and alot of times he fought the same guys in 2 or 3 different divisions. He moved up but he wa the bigger guy in nearly every fight and in alot of cases he was much bigger. Again, all these guys are so biased to the lighter looking hispanics and they basically consider Pac one. The whole ring hates Floyd. Dougie Fischer is the top writer and Oscar runs it. Who are they really going to pick?

okay.. first off.. your an idiot that is a hater on probably the best of our era, and second you are still and idiot, and third, anybody can do this to anybodys ****in Resume.

and Last but not least.. if you think that Floyd should be above Pacquiao (which i didn't see but i am assuming)

then look at his. He fought a Weight Drained Corrales who was clearly weight drained. A past prime Castillo who won the first fight. Castillo and Corrales both showed wear and tear from the wars that they were in. Zab Judah was to big, and is overrated and never did nothing and got knocked out So why does Floyd get credit for beating Judah when Cotto TKO'd him not to long later. Not a good win. De La Hoya was Old as hell, and he still couldn't knock him out or make him look bad like pacquiao did. He made Hatton go up in weight to fight him. ANd took him 10 rounds to knock him out, when Pac fought him at Hattons best weight and KNOCK HIM COLD in 2. SO floyds resume is hand picked. He ducked fighters from 135-up like Cotto, Mosley, Williams, Koysta, and Now Pacquaio.

Ya it hurts to see how much of and idiot you are

[baracuda]

srl, hopkins, de la hoya, hatton, roy jones, mosley, paulie mag, and many other fighters themselves said floyd was the greatest fighter of his generation... what else had to be said...formeman said this also....the ring magazine's owner called floyd the best of his generation. nothing else needs to be said...thread over...

you're lyin about all those names...floyd is the runner up according to the experts!...ha ha ha

[andrew14]

if he beat pbf and jmm.

he will be the best for this decade.

but if he added and defeated mosley and cotto and capture another ring lineal

he will overcome henry armstrong. mostly top 10 ATG for sure.

but thats hard to do.

[PoetryInMotion]

Anyone that argues with Pac as fighter of the decade until this point is simply biased. He's accomplished more than anyone, arguably fought the hardest competition, and has consistetly gotten better each fight. He's done things no other fighter has done in history. He's not as skilled as some fighters, but fighter of the decade isn't just about skill. That's the beauty of this sport.

According to who? You? I would say that anyone who says that Marquez didn't fight Pac to a draw(possibly even won) in both fights is simply biased. The difference is that Marquez wants Pac for a third fight, Pac wants nothing to do with it.

[chinoy]

Someone said that Floyd's record is padded. Have you seen Pac's? It is by far the most overrated resume in the history of boxing. He gets mad mad mad credit for doing things that he shouldnt. Like Raheem completey shuts out EM. No one had EM winning one round but Pac knocks him out in the next fight and everyone goes crazy like the Raheem fight never happened. Then they have the nerve to have a 3rd fight which people go crazy over again and never mind the fact that Pac made EM look like a boy in the ring. He was twice as big in the 2nd & 3rd fight as he was in the 1st. David Diaz? Maybe one of the worst champs ever. Oscar at WW with blood coming from the IV's in his arm where Pac weighed the exact same thing as him in the ring. Alot of people thought JMM won both fights. The 2nd MAB fight where MAB had done nothing to deserve it and was clearly as done as EM. Larios and all these guys past there prime and all coming off of recent losses.

All Pac has on his resume is names but none of the names matchup to the guys he fought. Nearly all of them were completely different guys when he fought them and all the good fighters were coming off of recent very bad losses when Pac beat them. Everyone credits him for moving up so much but who did he fight? He didnt fight nearly any big guys. He fought all guys that were also moving up and alot of times he fought the same guys in 2 or 3 different divisions. He moved up but he wa the bigger guy in nearly every fight and in alot of cases he was much bigger. Again, all these guys are so biased to the lighter looking hispanics and they basically consider Pac one. The whole ring hates Floyd. Dougie Fischer is the top writer and Oscar runs it. Who are they really going to pick?

Pac Hater of the Decade: XCARET. Runner up: DLT

go complain to the The Ring

[sandyvahra]

According to who? You? I would say that anyone who says that Marquez didn't fight Pac to a draw(possibly even won) in both fights is simply biased. The difference is that Marquez wants Pac for a third fight, Pac wants nothing to do with it.

:s, we're talking about fighter of the decade. not 1 fight. why should the fighter suffer for getting a close decision? Do we need to talk about floyd castillo 1? Pac fought Marquez twice, f the result, he fought the fight. His resume speaks volumes. Its not just about w's and l's my man. its about who u fight & fighting the best. You knock pac for not fighting marquez a third time? go knock floyd about not fighting a handful of fighters even once.

[miron_lang]

RESUME?


PACQUIAO Fought Marco Antonio Barrera, Erik Morales and Juan Manuel Marquez 7 times!!!


That's 7 fights againts Hall of Fame fighters!!!!!!

IS Diego Corrales at the level of these 3?
Is JLC at the level of these 3?
Is Genaro Hernadez at the level of these 3?

Mayweathers Resume doesnt even come close. Mayweather Fans (Im a fan) pls