The RING: Pacman is this decade's best!

[PoetryInMotion]

:s, we're talking about fighter of the decade. not 1 fight. why should the fighter suffer for getting a close decision? Do we need to talk about floyd castillo 1? Pac fought Marquez twice, f the result, he fought the fight. His resume speaks volumes. Its not just about w's and l's my man. its about who u fight & fighting the best. You knock pac for not fighting marquez a third time? go knock floyd about not fighting a handful of fighters even once.

I do knock Floyd for that. Knock Marquez for not fighting who? Old Casamayor> young David Diaz, young Juan Diaz> old De La Hoya and washed up Hatton.

[miron_lang]

Bernard is a already a more accomplished fighter then Pacquiao. Same goes for RJJ. Its like this

B-Hop > RJJ > Pacquiao > Mayweather

is this a joke?

RJJ didnt even fought Eubank and Benn.

Yes he's superman and indestructible force in his prime but he didnt fight the best of his generation.

Hopkins? as in ( Tarver, Pavlik, DLH, Trinidad ) againts ( Barrera, Morales, Marquez, Hatton ) ? are you sure?

[daggum]

joe calzaghe is undefeated and destroyed 2 p4p number 1 fighters back to back. how is he not number 1? also he destroyed mike tyson(lacy)

[daggum]

is this a joke?

RJJ didnt even fought Eubank and Benn.

Yes he's superman and indestructible force in his prime but he didnt fight the best of his generation.

Hopkins? as in ( Tarver, Pavlik, DLH, Trinidad ) againts ( Barrera, Morales, Marquez, Hatton ) ? are you sure?

are we supposed to pretend eubank and benn were the best?

[baracuda]

joe calzaghe is undefeated and destroyed 2 p4p number 1 fighters back to back. how is he not number 1? also he destroyed mike tyson(lacy)

because he only has 3 good wins ,the rest are unknown fighters....lacy is no mike tyson!

[miron_lang]

Everyone credits him for moving up so much but who did he fight?

Moving up from 122, Guest who were the TOP 3 Fighters of the Featherweights (126-130) as in the 3 very best and not just the featherweights but pound for pound ? .........hmmmmm i'll help you out.

Answers:
1. Marco Antonio Barrera
2. Erik Morales
3. Juan Manuel Marquez

How long did it take pac to take this fellas? did he wait before they get old or what? hhhhmmmm I'll help you out again

From November 2003 to March 2005 pac already fought ALL three. That's 14 months. at these times barrera was 29, Morales was 27 and Marquez was 29.

[miron_lang]

are we supposed to pretend eubank and benn were the best?

I was not counting Jones as part of the criteria but besides Jones. Benn might have a say. I'd say Jones was the best BUT didnt beat Nigel Benn in the ring.

[PoetryInMotion]

Moving up from 122, Guest who were the TOP 3 Fighters of the Featherweights (126-130) as in the 3 very best and not just the featherweights but pound for pound ? .........hmmmmm i'll help you out.

Answers:
1. Marco Antonio Barrera
2. Erik Morales
3. Juan Manuel Marquez

How long did it take pac to take this fellas? did he wait before they get old or what? hhhhmmmm I'll help you out again

From November 2003 to March 2005 pac already fought ALL three. That's 14 months. at these times barrera was 29, Morales was 27 and Marquez was 29.

I think waiting for Marquez to get old is exactly what Pac is doing. Lets not pretend that Pac beat Marquez decisively. Pac wants nothing to do with a third fight, when anyone else does this it's considered ducking.

[BmoreBrawler]

great list! I don't disagree with a single pick!

[woweezowee]

I think waiting for Marquez to get old is exactly what Pac is doing. Lets not pretend that Pac beat Marquez decisively. Pac wants nothing to do with a third fight, when anyone else does this it's considered ducking.

are you really sure on this one. think again who waited who?