Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The RING: Pacman is this decade's best!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by DLT View Post
    Someone said that Floyd's record is padded. Have you seen Pac's? It is by far the most overrated resume in the history of boxing. He gets mad mad mad credit for doing things that he shouldnt. Like Raheem completey shuts out EM. No one had EM winning one round but Pac knocks him out in the next fight and everyone goes crazy like the Raheem fight never happened. Then they have the nerve to have a 3rd fight which people go crazy over again and never mind the fact that Pac made EM look like a boy in the ring. He was twice as big in the 2nd & 3rd fight as he was in the 1st. David Diaz? Maybe one of the worst champs ever. Oscar at WW with blood coming from the IV's in his arm where Pac weighed the exact same thing as him in the ring. Alot of people thought JMM won both fights. The 2nd MAB fight where MAB had done nothing to deserve it and was clearly as done as EM. Larios and all these guys past there prime and all coming off of recent losses. All Pac has on his resume is names but none of the names matchup to the guys he fought. Nearly all of them were completely different guys when he fought them and all the good fighters were coming off of recent very bad losses when Pac beat them
    go compain to the ring experts!

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by baracuda View Post
      go compain to the ring experts!
      Experts of what? Theyre not different than any other boxing site. People think the Ring is bond but its still all politics. The Ring was the most crooked of all of them back in the day and now everyone acts like theyre the King. Come on now. Theyre is no way that those writers and Golden Boy would pick Floyd over Pac. It wont happened no matter what

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by The_Executioner View Post
        That's ******ed. The decade isn't even over yet. So wat happens if Floyd beats Marquez then Pacquiao this year? Or Marquez then Cotto?

        What if Bernard beats Dawson?

        O wait Oscar owns the Ring...that makes sense...
        Bernard is a already a more accomplished fighter then Pacquiao. Same goes for RJJ. Its like this

        B-Hop > RJJ > Pacquiao > Mayweather

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by The_Executioner View Post
          If he gives Marquez a boxing lesson or stops him he will credit regardless of the weight. A close win doesn't do too much for him.

          In that case Pac doesn't get credit for beating a drained and old De La Hoya or a weight drained war veteran Morales.
          Pac try to fight the odds before the fight after he made Oskee quit in his stool critics again made an excuse about weight drained. Weight drained Pacquiao whooped Marquez in the canvass and won the fight. Morales still looks good when Pac beats him of ofcourse if your a hater you won't agree with me... Pac is the best fighter in the decade learn to live with it.

          Comment


          • #25
            damn dude, you got me thinking

            Comment


            • #26
              If pacs resume is padded..............PBF's resume is chicken****e....just saying.........

              Comment


              • #27
                The hype is just getting out of hand

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by DLT View Post
                  Experts of what? Theyre not different than any other boxing site. People think the Ring is bond but its still all politics. The Ring was the most crooked of all of them back in the day and now everyone acts like theyre the King. Come on now. Theyre is no way that those writers and Golden Boy would pick Floyd over Pac. It wont happened no matter what

                  that's your opinion but obviously those experts don't agree with you!pac's more accomplished than floyd,bottomline!try accepting the things you cannot change,you'll feel better!

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by baracuda View Post
                    that's your opinion but obviously those experts don't agree with you!pac's more accomplished than floyd,bottomline!try accepting the things you cannot change,you'll feel better!
                    I will easily accept but my point is that you cant take it as gospel just because theyre the ring. Its still basically just like another site and you know that another site could easily have Floyd rated as the best. How can you really be #1 after the stuff I just said and the fact that JMM has won way more of the combined rounds on the judges scorecards? If that was Floyd they would be bringing that up non stop and taking credit from him

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by DLT View Post
                      I will easily accept but my point is that you cant take it as gospel just because theyre the ring. Its still basically just like another site and you know that another site could easily have Floyd rated as the best. How can you really be #1 after the stuff I just said and the fact that JMM has won way more of the combined rounds on the judges scorecards? If that was Floyd they would be bringing that up non stop and taking credit from him
                      they had floyd as a runner up eventhough he has not fought in almost 2 years,don't you think that's pretty generous?....i think so

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP