The RING: Pacman is this decade's best!
Collapse
-
Skills shouldn't make up a large part of judgement. Titles like the decades bet fighter should be based on acheivements. I mean if a fighter came out of the woodwork with a horrible style, but he beat Floyd, Pacquaio, Marquez, Williams, Cotto, and Mosely in succession, then I would class him as the decades best fighter even though he has a horrible style.Comment
-
Most definitely the best in the decade. No boxer today has achieve what Pac has this decade.Comment
-
He won't, have you looked at floyds resume, **** is quite padded. I don't even know how he was even p4p number 1... Is beating ricky hatton at 147 p4p material. Or is it the fact beating Oscar in a close fight(mayweather definitely won but you can't say Oscar wasn't in it since when he jabbed he was winning) a p4p material... And what is it, manny jumped 7 different weight classes and won 7 different titles? Correct me if I'm wrong... And Manny fought people who weren't just brawlers and left their hands low nearly the entire fights. Corrales??? He is a good warrior but he is not known for even a solid defense. No wonder why his ass was put down like 4-5 times before Mayweather put him out. Ricky Hatton??? Come on now...
All the pacman haters keep talking about this hype-train but the truth is, the hype-train is bigger on Mayweathers nutts then it has ever been on Mannys.Comment
Comment