Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Kirkland a Suspect in Another Action, More Drama

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by QUISQUEYA View Post
    Are you an attorney or a constitutional law specialist?...or just an angry boxing fan?
    Neither, I'm not a big fan of Kirkland either, but it sucks to here news like this.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by QUISQUEYA View Post
      You keep saying this. What section of the Constitution are they violating?

      btw, you will earn more credibility if you spell it correctly.
      Well the second ********* says a citizen has the right to bear arms, and has Kirkland been involved in an armed robbery 2003? No, so this is just illegal su****ion by the police which is unconstitutional in the first place. We don't know what his punishment will be, but if it hurts his boxing career, like 10 years in jail, then that's BS. It's just common sense. If I were Kirkland I would challenge the court.
      Last edited by Boxingwizard; 04-22-2009, 10:16 AM.

      Comment


      • #33
        wow

        what a dumbass

        Comment


        • #34
          This is terrible. It's not looking good for him.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by darkstar777 View Post
            Well the second ********* says a citizen has the right to bear arms, and has Kirkland been involved in an armed robbery 2003? No, so this is just illegal su****ion by the police which is unconstitutional in the first place. We don't know what his punishment will be, but if it hurts his boxing career, like 10 years in jail, then that's BS. It's just common sense. If I were Kirkland I would challenge the court.
            Yes, the second ********* does say you have the right to bear arm, but that's only valid if you're not a CONVICTED FELON. Just because he hasn't done anything wrong since 2003 (as far as we're concerned), he's still under probation! Even if he was off probation by LAW its illegal for ANY person to carry a firearm if a convicted felon. If you want to talk about rights then you should more concerned about those people he robbed instead of his this dumbass n!gga. As far as his right to bear arms, well he ****ed that up when he decided to commit a crime.

            ...Fam, what is there to challenge? What is Kirkland going to say, "You violated my right to posses a gun just because I violated my probation? Cut me some slack your honor, i'm the next big thing in boxing!."...come on man get real.
            Last edited by antweezy23; 04-22-2009, 10:38 AM.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by darkstar777 View Post
              Well the second ********* says a citizen has the right to bear arms, and has Kirkland been involved in an armed robbery 2003? No, so this is just illegal su****ion by the police which is unconstitutional in the first place. We don't know what his punishment will be, but if it hurts his boxing career, like 10 years in jail, then that's BS. It's just common sense. If I were Kirkland I would challenge the court.
              He's a FELON dude, the 2nd ********* no longer applies to him. The 2nd ********* applies to law abiding citizens. Not wannabe gangsters thinking an automatic pistol makes them tougher. Besides, he bought a Glock, he should have purchased a Taurus, infinitely more reliable. But that's besides the point...

              He doesn't need to be involved in another Armed Robbery to be denied gun access, what the heck is wrong with your logic here. Armed Robbery typically leads to more violent crimes, why should he ever be allowed to carry a gun. It's not illegal su****ion, the ATF SAW him give money to a significant other to purchase a handgun. He can challenge the court all day until he's blue in the face the point is, conditions of his probation says that he'll never be able to have/own a handgun in any manner.

              If in the event that it was for 'safety purposes' then with his purse money, an apartment away from dangerous depots is probably where he should be living at. Again it's own fault, the privilege of being an athlete is lost upon him and hopefully now that his career may or may not be over, hopefully he reflects on himself and asks...'was it really worth it?'

              Comment


              • #37
                you can't train a thug to not be a thug.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by TheManchine View Post
                  In 20 years they'll be saying how Kirkland could have, should have, would have unified the light middleweight, middleweight, super middleweight and light heavyweight divisions...
                  I hope thats a joke. He's not bad but had no defense really. A fighter like him its only a matter of time before they take one too many. I believe it was brian vera that I was watching that stunned him a couple times, imagine what a hard punching super middleweight would do to him? And he's 5'9" so I doubt he would be able to bully people around even at middleweight like he does at jr middle.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    ending you career before it begins: priceless

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Kirkland needs some high power attorneys that'll get him off; anyone know if any members "the dream team" are still practicing?...

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP