Workrate wins fights all the ****in time. Accuarcy should be more important, but it's all subjective. When 1 guy is accurate and the other is twice as active, unless the accurate fighter's shots are clearly hurtin the other guy and doin some damage, the judges are gonna rule aginst him.
since when did workrate win fights???its ******
Collapse
-
i agree...penalosa should have gotten the decision of DPDLComment
-
boxing means landing punches..not throwing......fast pace???so i can run around the ring beating up the air and i win the fight???wow boxing sure has changedIf one fighter is not throwing many punches then obviously the other fighter's workrate is helping him control the fight and giving the other fighter problems so why shouldn't it win you a fight?
Workrate and stamina is a skill, it gives people problems because they can't keep up with it so i don't see why they should win a fight for not being good enough to keep up with someones fast pace.Comment
-
there's lots of different ways to win a round. if both guys aren't landing accurate punches, the more active boxer can still the round.Comment
-
Comment
-
People seem to forget the term is "Effective Aggression"Comment
Comment