#1 You've probably only watched Hagler-Hearns. Go and find some of his fights between 77-82. Absolute machine. Btw, what do call boxing fundamentals? Because I'd say a jab is pretty important/fundamental and Hagler had one of the best, most accurate, stiffest jabs I've seen, whereas Floyd doesn't. Hagler was also a great counter-puncher in his prime
#2 Leonard/Whitaker are more skilled than Mayweather. Leonard had a better offense and a very good defense too. Whereas Whitaker was damn near impossible to tag.
#3 Leonard was faster than Floyd and I honestly smarter in the ring. You don't beat Wilfred Benitez, Roberto Duran (although his gameplan for the first fight wouldn't be called smart - I'll give you that one!), Tommy Hearns and Marvin Hagler without having ring smarts
#2 Leonard/Whitaker are more skilled than Mayweather. Leonard had a better offense and a very good defense too. Whereas Whitaker was damn near impossible to tag.
#3 Leonard was faster than Floyd and I honestly smarter in the ring. You don't beat Wilfred Benitez, Roberto Duran (although his gameplan for the first fight wouldn't be called smart - I'll give you that one!), Tommy Hearns and Marvin Hagler without having ring smarts
Comment