OK. At least you are now trying analyze your theory. I disagree on a couple of your assertions.
1. You're completely stuck on the term "workrate" when it comes to Calzaghe. In Calzhaghe's case, the only reason his workrate is so successful is because he's elusive as hell. Just look at him toy with Roy last week. Yes...I know you'll say Roy was washed up. But, throughout his undefeated career...the point remains.
2. You believe that Calzaghe's defense is "not Jones's". I disagree. Calzaghe is extremely difficult to hit squarely. Surely, we can agree that Ruiz cannot even compare to the speed Calzaghe faced in his career.
3. You say Jones packs alot more power than Calzaghe. I agree to the extent that Roy's power was probably greater than Calzaghe's (although we Americans like to underrate Calzaghe's power). But, Ruiz wasn't afraid of Jones' "power." You're missing the point. Ruiz simply could not catch Roy, so Roy won. It was as simple as that. Likewise, I have my doubts that Ruiz could have caught Joe.
1. You're completely stuck on the term "workrate" when it comes to Calzaghe. In Calzhaghe's case, the only reason his workrate is so successful is because he's elusive as hell. Just look at him toy with Roy last week. Yes...I know you'll say Roy was washed up. But, throughout his undefeated career...the point remains.
2. You believe that Calzaghe's defense is "not Jones's". I disagree. Calzaghe is extremely difficult to hit squarely. Surely, we can agree that Ruiz cannot even compare to the speed Calzaghe faced in his career.
3. You say Jones packs alot more power than Calzaghe. I agree to the extent that Roy's power was probably greater than Calzaghe's (although we Americans like to underrate Calzaghe's power). But, Ruiz wasn't afraid of Jones' "power." You're missing the point. Ruiz simply could not catch Roy, so Roy won. It was as simple as that. Likewise, I have my doubts that Ruiz could have caught Joe.
Comment