did Jones avoid the best fighters and fight so cautiously cause

[Deadbirds]

nobody wants to read all your exclamation points

Obviously you read it ! Quit whinning ! who cares how I do my post ! If it really bothers you don't read it !

[Chase8400]

How am I a Jones hater? Please exaplain that to me. Like I said, its a cop out for Jones LOVERS/FANBOYS like you to suggest anyone who criticises him is a hater. You're so emotional and sensitive, its quite pathetic.

So Hopkins was ranked the number 1 fighter at middleweight but he wasnt the best at the weight?

That makes perfect sense.

You go in and look at the current #1 middleweight, loser.

http://www.thering-online.com/ringpages/ratings2.html

Now come back here and say something else ******. Man, you irritate me sometimes with your hard headedness.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

You go in and look at the current #1 middleweight, loser.

http://www.thering-online.com/ringpages/ratings2.html

Now come back here and say something else ******. Man, you irritate me sometimes with your hard headedness.

Why would I need to? The current number 1 middleweight is Pavlik.......because he beat the man, because he holds most of the belts etc.

Hopkins was fighting dudes with losses in the double figure columns and had never had a title fight yet you think he was the best Middleweight?

Amazing.

[THE REED]

Why would I need to? The current number 1 middleweight is Pavlik.......because he beat the man, because he holds most of the belts etc.

Hopkins was fighting dudes with losses in the double figure columns and had never had a title fight yet you think he was the best Middleweight?

Amazing.

if he wasnt the best middleweight, then why, after he lost to roy, did he never lose again at middleweight for the next 10 years.

If he wasnt the best at the time, the best would have beat him.

[Burner]

A prime Roy Jones would make SRR look like Mayorga.

The dude had skills we will never see again.

[Chase8400]

Intellect? You thought the word was "studder". Im sorry but I just found that hilarious.

Apparently, you knew what I was talking about so who really gives a ****? Outmatched you are, again. Face it one day. Self realization can be a killer for alot of people like you though.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

if he wasnt the best middleweight, then why, after he lost to roy, did he never lose again at middleweight for the next 10 years.

If he wasnt the best at the time, the best would have beat him.

Because he wasnt the best middleweight at that time. Thats the point. And it cant be argued.

It would be like me saying David Haye is the best heavyweight right now cos I believe he could be. But he has to actually go and do it. Know what i mean?

[Chase8400]

if he wasnt the best middleweight, then why, after he lost to roy, did he never lose again at middleweight for the next 10 years.

If he wasnt the best at the time, the best would have beat him.

This dude never ceases to amaze me with this ****** ****. He won't even go to see who the #1 ranked middleweight is in attampt to salvage his self-defined dignity. What a ****** mother****er.

[hishaam15]

Because he wasnt the best middleweight at that time. Thats the point. And it cant be argued.

It would be like me saying David Haye is the best heavyweight right now cos I believe he could be. But he has to actually go and do it. Know what i mean?

you talking about when Roy fought Nard in 93?
yes, Nard was the number 1 middle back then, and Roy was the number 2

[THE REED]

Because he wasnt the best middleweight at that time. Thats the point. And it cant be argued.

It would be like me saying David Haye is the best heavyweight right now cos I believe he could be. But he has to actually go and do it. Know what i mean?

no I dont.. because bernard ALREADY DID IT... theres no wait and see IF he is the best...

he was

Bernard was the Best MW out there, being that he didnt lose for the next 10 years