Hopkins that fought Tito would of beaten Calz with ease he would have crusied past Joe if he could of sustain his activity, Joe is all about Workrate when he comes foward and he has never faced a defensively sound fighter like Hopkins in his life and when he did he was getting showed how good he actually is and Toney makes him look worse
Is Joe Calzaghe the best fighter Roy Jones will have fought?
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Hopkins that fought Tito would of beaten Calz with ease he would have crusied past Joe if he could of sustain his activity, Joe is all about Workrate when he comes foward and he has never faced a defensively sound fighter like Hopkins in his life and when he did he was getting showed how good he actually is and Toney makes him look worseComment
-
Tarver just aint popular cause he beat Roy Jones but there is no doubting the guys abilityComment
-
Thats not true at all. I could have made a case for Hopkins beating the better fighters, but refuesed to do becuase i am very unbiased and don't want to blow things out of poportion. Pound for pound, you could make a strong case for Bernard Hopkins beating the better fighters and more ACCOMPLISHED champions. Trinidad, Tarver, Wright, De La Hoya, Joppy ectera. All are more accomplished fighter than both Lacy and Kessler.Comment
-
That is just a ridiculous statement to make Tarver is easy on the level of Eubank and Benn if not better ,Tarver has beaten an Elite fighter which Elite fighter has Eubank beat Henry Wharton ,Dan Sherry ,Gary Stretch lol
Tarver just aint popular cause he beat Roy Jones but there is no doubting the guys ability
Both were elite.Comment
-
Well what sounds more contradictory the fact that u think he is a better fighter when Hopkins arguably beat him and was 43 years old and on that evidence u think it is sufficient to suggest he would beat a prime Hopkins or he was a better fighter than Hopkins overall
how cares if he turned a fight down with Joe or not if dont mean Calz would of beat him does itComment
-
Thats not true at all. I could have made a case for Hopkins beating the better fighters, but refuesed to do becuase i am very unbiased and don't want to blow things out of poportion. Pound for pound, you could make a strong case for Bernard Hopkins beating the better fighters and more ACCOMPLISHED champions. Trinidad, Tarver, Wright, De La Hoya, Joppy ectera. All are more accomplished fighter than both Lacy and Kessler.
Tarver just wasn't that good, he had a shot Roy Jones. Guys like Harding and Glen were never A-level fighters. They were solid B. Virgil Hill was always a B-level fighter (you mensioned him earlier in the debate with Roy) and Ruiz is a ****in C-level HW. He is garbage.Comment
-
no both were not Elite at all McClellan was suffering from Brain Injury unless no one had told u and he was still infront in that fight Benn would not have won if not for Injury so again u are talking complete bullComment
-
Well what sounds more contradictory the fact that u think he is a better fighter when Hopkins arguably beat him and was 43 years old and on that evidence u think it is sufficient to suggest he would beat a prime Hopkins or he was a better fighter than Hopkins overall
how cares if he turned a fight down with Joe or not if dont mean Calz would of beat him does it
Calzaghe UD.Comment
Comment