Whitttaker was much better than Mayweather ever was
Collapse
-
Floyd could not beat an Old Oscar Dela Hoya convincingly
he had trouble with Zab Judad who like Oscar is Notorious for fading in fights
he had trouble with Castillo ,PW took the daddy of Mexicans to school J C Chavez
Whitaker mixed it with better company and allthough PBF has tremendous skills i have never seen it showcased against the best frequently enough
so Whitaker for meComment
-
i can never pick a winner in this fight because i dont want to, the fight would be incredibly boring with each person trying to wait for an opening. it would be incredibly defensive and you all would be asleep.Comment
-
Floyd could not beat an Old Oscar Dela Hoya convincingly
he had trouble with Zab Judad who like Oscar is Notorious for fading in fights
he had trouble with Castillo ,PW took the daddy of Mexicans to school J C Chavez
Whitaker mixed it with better company and allthough PBF has tremendous skills i have never seen it showcased against the best frequently enough
so Whitaker for meComment
-
Mayweather adjusted and that lead opening dissapeared, i think you are severely underrating mayweathers ability to adjust.
i can never pick a winner in this fight because i dont want to, the fight would be incredibly boring with each person trying to wait for an opening. it would be incredibly defensive and you all would be asleep.
u could also say that both are notorious for fading in fights and having poor stamina infact both have previously lost big fights due to there stamina probelms and lack of activity in the later rounds especially JudahComment
-
No, just no. He was very very good, but the more you look into Mayweather the more perfect he seems. Whitaker's defense looks very impressive but note he waste much energy and has no chance to counter, until his opponent stops punching. Floyd used the shoulder much better and could fight in the pocket. Plus he could also slip punches. Power and stamina aren't comparable. Speed also a win for Mayweather. Prime for prime btw.Comment
-
After seeing your responses in that sugar ray leonard/mayweather thread by diego, i cant take anything you say without a grain of salt.Comment
-
No, just no. He was very very good, but the more you look into Mayweather the more perfect he seems. Whitaker's defense looks very impressive but notehe waste much energy and has no chance to counter, until his opponent stops punching. Floyd used the shoulder much better and could fight in the pocket. Plus he could also slip punches. Power and stamina aren't comparable. Speed also a win for Mayweather. Prime for prime btw.
point im trying to make is u have to use more movement against good fighters u cannot afford to stand infront of them no matter how good u are in the pocket a lesson Floyd found out when he tried to do it against J L Castillo in the first fight he was hit with looping right hands in both his fights with Castillo when he was languishing on the ropes
shoulder rolling is more effective against the likes of N'Dou cause he is a limited fighter but it wont work as effective against good fightersLast edited by Dynamite Kid; 06-28-2008, 08:38 AM.Comment
-
No, just no. He was very very good, but the more you look into Mayweather the more perfect he seems. Whitaker's defense looks very impressive but note he waste much energy and has no chance to counter, until his opponent stops punching. Floyd used the shoulder much better and could fight in the pocket. Plus he could also slip punches. Power and stamina aren't comparable. Speed also a win for Mayweather. Prime for prime btw.
Whitaker was an excellent counterpuncher. Furthermore, I fail to see how he "waste much energy" when he did it for twelve rounds every time. In other words, this is irrelevant.
Finally, this is boxing. We go by resume, not skill. Or else Zab Judah would be on everybody's top twenty list. Guess why he's not?Comment
Comment