Whitttaker was much better than Mayweather ever was
Collapse
-
-
Who cares if Zab was a problem for Floyd, he lost. Floyd is a problem for whitaker. Roger Mayweather was a problem for whitaker. You have no point. Sometimes it takes rounds to solve a fighter's style. It only counts who wins in the end. There isn't a fighter on this planet who has never had promblems with a fighter early in the fight, unless that fighter isn't facing top notch opposition.Comment
-
And you dont think Floyd would cause problems for Whitaker..its Floyd Mayweather its not Arturo Gatti.Comment
-
This thread is pretty silly. Whitaker was pretty much better than everybody.
there's no shame in not being as good as Pea.Comment
-
Comment
-
Man, this is the the 4th thread about this I have seen. And I think it's great. If your a "BLOOD AND GUTS WARRIOR" Jim Lampley type, then this fight wouldn't be for you.
If you want to see two gifted technical fighters, then this matchup could be a boxing geeks wet dream.
Can't call it. Toss up fight, prime for prime.Comment
-
Whitaker would have been a bad style matchup for Floyd with his jab, body attack and obvious ability to exchange while avoiding punches.
Whitaker on his best night was an impossible puzzle to solve. I can't see any other Lightweight or Junior Welterweight beating him at his best.
Floyd is a great fighter though. He was very skilled and was dedicated to training. Whitaker lacked that type of dedication at the end of his career.
If Roger can hit Pea, then Floyd can hit Pea.Comment
-
Mayweather defense was slightly better then Pernell.
Pernell was a better body puncher and had more power
Mayweather was slightly more accurate and had better hand speed
Stamina was same
Idk who to pick here.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
Comment