If Manny Pacquaio wins a 4th belt, will he be ranked higher than Morales or Barrera?
Collapse
-
Comment
-
Because all of them are great fighters.
Mexicans will always think that Morales and MAB are ranked higher than PAC
Filipinos will do the same for PAC
between themselves without the bull ****s its pac hands down.Comment
-
hey Mayan Sun, or whatever you are..................i said morales and Barreras competition and fighters defeated where better than Pac's in my 1st post.............you simpleton.
Manny has a good chin, as evidenced by the guys he 's faced and has yet to be dropped legitimitely. Not too many questioned marquez,Morales and Barreras chins, yet he managed to drop them all.
Put your bias aside, and recognize that Pac is good and has beaten who he needed to beat.
I would love to se him against Guzman, but not Soto, he lost against Guzman and lost his chance to fight Manny.
The DIaz fight will be harder and closer than most are expecting.Last edited by BennyST; 06-13-2008, 03:35 AM.Comment
-
Man, apparently I'm on my own in thinking that Pacquiao starting at 108 and winning a 130 Ring title as well as ABC belt is as great as I think it is.
Morales and Barrera were both basically 122 fighters, and neither really fought the stellar type of competition that would transcend making that many jumps in weight successfully.
Comment
-
Comment
-
I think Morales in particular was for sure a better fighter, but I think Pacquaio has already surpassed him in terms of resume.
Winning a title at 112 and 130?
Ring titles at 126 and 130 after starting at 108? That is insane!
Seriously, Pacquiao has the best resume in boxing right now, hands down now that Mayweather is retired, and the argument can be effectively argued that Manny had a better resume than him even when Floyd was active, just not hands down.
i can't really understand how so many people can ignore those achievements.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
Comment