Joe Cazaghe's resume: very impressive
Collapse
-
http://www.boxrec.com/list_bouts.php...4398&cat=boxerI do this for a living, ok? So go back and do all the research you want and I'm sure you'll find the fighter. In fact, he was Polish or something...and TERRIBLE.
Finally, what you said being accurate doesn't make it IMPRESSIVE. Beating some 12-0 bum named Delaney ISN'T IMPRESSIVE. Neither is beating Mario Veit twice, or a whole bunch of other crap you threw in there to try and hype up his record. It's a solid record, it doesn't need bull****. And it is what it is. Good, not great.
You probably mean this guy. He isn't undefeated but has a hell of a record for a mediocre fighter.Comment
-
Are you serious?Don't make out like Hopkins was a puny Middleweight because Hopkins infact started out as a Light Heavyweight, it's hardly an incredible feat is it?
Glen Johnson at the time was a journeyman, don't be blinded by his undefeated record, that win is no where near as good as it is made out.
Bernard Hopkins started as a cruiserweight, first of all. A really, really fat one. So what are you saying?
So is Glen Johnson still a journeyman now that he has 10, 11 losses?
Loser.Comment
-
Thanks, man. Perfect example of how records don't mean ****.http://www.boxrec.com/list_bouts.php...4398&cat=boxer
You probably mean this guy. He isn't undefeated but has a hell of a record for a mediocre fighter.Comment
-
Reply to that.
Loser.Comment
-
What point are you trying to make. Didn't BOXREC tell you that? Isn't that where you get your knowledge? LMAO.
You make a thread on Hopkins-Mercado when it's obbvious you never saw the fight, and then you make a thread on the many robberies Glen Johnson went through when you never saw those either.
You know what? I'm done with you. You know very little about any of the fights you wanna discuss and you know even less about boxing.Comment
Comment