i think jmm takes this one, at 126. looks like pac settled in nicely @ 130 ... if jmm comes up then i say 50/50 ... you don't lose all our ability going up 4lbs ... close fight, no blow out either way .. well ... jmm is probably the one, if anyone wins in a blowout, who'd do it. minus the 1st round in their first fight, jmm would have dominated the entire fight. prolly like 117-110 or something. but pac really changed it up and now when he complains about something,,,, i think i'll believe him after what he did to morales. he said there were something wrong w/ his socks in the jmm fight. right?
Can Pacquiao beat JMM?
Collapse
-
better believe him coz he has backed his words with action.Originally posted by bayai think jmm takes this one, at 126. looks like pac settled in nicely @ 130 ... if jmm comes up then i say 50/50 ... you don't lose all our ability going up 4lbs ... close fight, no blow out either way .. well ... jmm is probably the one, if anyone wins in a blowout, who'd do it. minus the 1st round in their first fight, jmm would have dominated the entire fight. prolly like 117-110 or something. but pac really changed it up and now when he complains about something,,,, i think i'll believe him after what he did to morales. he said there were something wrong w/ his socks in the jmm fight. right?
ALWAYS.Comment
-
i wouldn't have replied had it been anyone else, but coming from a dumbass like you, i have to say ..... fokk off and i'll make decisions for myselfOriginally posted by dep_violatorbetter believe him coz he has backed his words with action.
ALWAYS.
Comment
-
** Of course Pac KOs Marquez which is why he's fighting for a 50 grand purse in Indonesia instead of big bucks against Manny. Follow the money boys, or in Marquez's case, drop all the money honey and run like HELL!Comment
-
Yes.... Pac has a decent chance of beating JMM.In the first fight Juan figured Pac out in a round or 2 not before getting caught by Pacs power though.Going into a second fight you would figure that JMM would dominate the fight from 1 to 12, atleast that is what logic tells me, but....I think if Pac takes his time and throws combos and body shots just like he did againts Morales he would win a close decision or if Marquez has slowed down a bit he might even get another tko.Im going to go with logic and say JMM boxes Pac and wins by UD. I think Marquez would have beat Barrera and Morales at any time in their respective primes.Comment
-
withou a doudt he figrued out pac after that first roundOriginally posted by !{BrownBomber}Yes.... Pac has a decent chance of beating JMM.In the first fight Juan figured Pac out in a round or 2 not before getting caught by Pacs power though.Going into a second fight you would figure that JMM would dominate the fight from 1 to 12, atleast that is what logic tells me, but....I think if Pac takes his time and throws combos and body shots just like he did againts Morales he would win a close decision or if Marquez has slowed down a bit he might even get another tko.Im going to go with logic and say JMM boxes Pac and wins by UD. I think Marquez would have beat Barrera and Morales at any time in their respective primes.
cept the thing is
pacs not the same fighters
hes grown tremendously
so it wouldnt be nowhere like the first fight
well itd still be JMM winning a decision
but i think itd be a whole diff kinda fightComment
-
Pacquiao has improved immensely since May 8, 2004. Barrera and Marquez have no shot against this Pacquiao that destroyed Morales.Comment
-
Yes, Pacman has a chance of beating JMM. Pacman, even though he still prefers the left punch, has improved on his right hand. His trainer, Roach, will get him ready for JMM if their is even a 2nd match. Look at the win over Morales the 2nd time, the HBO commentators said that EM can't stop the left of Manny and MP is landing good shots with his right.
If u read on one of the past issues of Ring mag or KO mag, on the interview of EM, he said that JMM is a scared fighter. I will find the mag and post his comment about JMM later.Last edited by loui_ludwig; 01-29-2006, 09:22 AM.Comment
Comment