Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Calzaghe is overrated

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by kswizzy99 View Post
    biased? I don't have favoritisms when it comes to opinions. and I don't hate calzaghe and I'm not black. so I don't know where you biased thing is comming from. and I do know boxing, you are the one who doesn't know boxing. I've watched thousand apon thousands of boxing matchs since I was 11 years old. I know boxing inside out and I know talent just from watching 3-4 rounds of one fighter. its not rocket science, its boxing.
    Tis a shame that with so much experience, you still lack the abilities of a novice to analyze a fighter.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Nwahs !! View Post
      I dont believe it is possible to see 10 of Joe's fights without becoming a both a fan, and a believer.
      I have free satellite. and I am a die hard BOXING fan. I've watched every saturday night fight for the last 5 years atleast. and thats a completely random assumption considering you don't know me.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by kswizzy99 View Post
        Calzaghe is way overrated. He has yet to beat an elite boxer. How is he rated in the top 2 or 3 p4p? What has he done? I mean if he is so good, why hasn't he fought a great fighter. Kessler is the best he's fought and Kessler is barely an above average boxer. I'm not saying that Calzaghe is bad, but one of the best p4p? I don't think he belongs in the top 10 even. If he gets into the ring with Hopkins, Pavlik, Taylor, or Wright and beats either one of them, than he belongs, otherwise, he is way too overrated.
        Just out of intrest what do you think of Hopkins? before i make my arguement for Calzaghe considering their career are very similar apart from Calzaghe atually beat the top fighters in his division.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Nwahs !! View Post
          Tis a shame that with so much experience, you still lack the abilities of a novice to analyze a fighter.
          Tis a shame that you can't analyse boxing good enough to know I'm right.

          Comment


          • #35
            i'm just waiting to see your reasoning for rating paul williams above joe calzaghe.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by kswizzy99 View Post
              Tis a shame that you can't analyse boxing good enough to know I'm right.
              Obviously...

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Ryno113 View Post
                Just out of intrest what do you think of Hopkins? before i make my arguement for Calzaghe considering their career are very similar apart from Calzaghe atually beat the top fighters in his division.
                OH........MY...........GOD. you didn't just say it. you said hopkins and calzaghe's careers are similar. and by the way, I like calzaghe more than hopkins cuz I don't like hopkins style of fighting. but don't you ever, dare to say that their careers are similar. hopkins is a legend, calzaghe isn't even a hall of famer in my opinion. hopkins beat winky, tarver, taylor(in my opinion), de la hoya, joppy, trinidad, holmes. Please, thats blasfimy. don't ever say something so ******.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by rooq View Post
                  i'm just waiting to see your reasoning for rating paul williams above joe calzaghe.
                  better talent, better talent in oposition. I don't like margarito, but he is a better talent than kessler. and I count ducking when it comes to a fighter. cuz if a fighter is ducked, that means his oposition see something that they don't like and don't want to fight thim, which is as good as a win.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by kswizzy99 View Post
                    better talent, better talent in oposition. I don't like margarito, but he is a better talent than kessler. and I count ducking when it comes to a fighter. cuz if a fighter is ducked, that means his oposition see something that they don't like and don't want to fight thim, which is as good as a win.
                    Based on this post, it sounds like you have no clue what talent is.
                    You don't know what talent is.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by kswizzy99 View Post
                      Calzaghe is way overrated. He has yet to beat an elite boxer. How is he rated in the top 2 or 3 p4p? What has he done? I mean if he is so good, why hasn't he fought a great fighter. Kessler is the best he's fought and Kessler is barely an above average boxer. I'm not saying that Calzaghe is bad, but one of the best p4p? I don't think he belongs in the top 10 even. If he gets into the ring with Hopkins, Pavlik, Taylor, or Wright and beats either one of them, than he belongs, otherwise, he is way too overrated.
                      So if he beats another American he can be in your top 10 P4P? How biased of you...

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP