Calzaghe is overrated

[Luciano]

LOL. Calzaghe fought at 168, the weakest division in the last 15 years. He beat Lacy, who is technically horrible, and a B fighter, just possessing power. And he beat Kessler, who is another overhyped European with power and horrible technical skills. He may be a top 5 168 lbs. but technically he's going to get destroyed tomorrow and it'll be another European fighter with hype getting humbled.

[blockhead]

LOL. Calzaghe fought at 168, the weakest division in the last 15 years. He beat Lacy, who is technically horrible, and a B fighter, just possessing power. And he beat Kessler, who is another overhyped European with power and horrible technical skills. He may be a top 5 168 lbs. but technically he's going to get destroyed tomorrow and it'll be another European fighter with hype getting humbled.

you're not very smart.

[Luciano]

you're not very smart.

Coming from a gay guy who doesn't expand on any boxing just makes **** remarks?? Okay. Fool.

[blockhead]

Coming from a gay guy who doesn't expand on any boxing just makes **** remarks?? Okay. Fool.

what? your post doesnt even makes sense moron.
actually none of them do.
so you're into the gay talk. send me a pm and we can make something happen sweet lover.

[Luciano]

what? your post doesnt even makes sense moron.
actually none of them do.
so you're into the gay talk. send me a pm and we can make something happen sweet lover.

You exposed yourself like Calzaghe coming to fight in the U.S. Real clever response fruitcake.

[blockhead]

You exposed yourself like Calzaghe coming to fight in the U.S. Real clever response fruitcake.

i know it was clever.
thank you cupcake.

[-Swizzy-]

gotta give my first official cong**** to calzaghe on a great win. calzaghe really dominated on the punching and it was a legitamate decision that should've been a UD IMO. He did better than I thought he would and he made hopkins look worse than he probably ever did in his career. I do think he belongs in the top 5 p4p for yesterdays victory even though it was over a 43 year old hops just cuz of the dominating fashion in which he won but I still don't like his fighting style. calz was holding just as much as hops was yesterday.

the question that will never be answered is if calz could've done this 5 years ago. alot of ppl on this forum see it clear that hops would've taken the win a couple of years ago and I was saying the same thing a couple of days ago but after yesterday I am split 50/50 cuz I don't know who would've won this. hops was a completely different fighter back than but calzaghe did dominate hops. Its just one of those hypothetical matchups that you wish could happen but know will never happen.

[RichCCFC]

gotta give my first official cong**** to calzaghe on a great win. calzaghe really dominated on the punching and it was a legitamate decision that should've been a UD IMO. He did better than I thought he would and he made hopkins look worse than he probably ever did in his career. I do think he belongs in the top 5 p4p for yesterdays victory even though it was over a 43 year old hops just cuz of the dominating fashion in which he won but I still don't like his fighting style. calz was holding just as much as hops was yesterday.

the question that will never be answered is if calz could've done this 5 years ago. alot of ppl on this forum see it clear that hops would've taken the win a couple of years ago and I was saying the same thing a couple of days ago but after yesterday I am split 50/50 cuz I don't know who would've won this. hops was a completely different fighter back than but calzaghe did dominate hops. Its just one of those hypothetical fights that you wish should've happened and know could never happen.

Speechless...

[-Swizzy-]

I can't believe the british fans didn't jump on this thread and give it to me. weird.

[robjr]

lol this thread brings me back