Mayweather's time started in 1998, so has he. And yes, he fought the best at his time at 147.
You are being silly. How is even just Hatton and Zab put together not going to be better than Cotto or Williams? We are talking pound for pound right (?), because that's how Mayweather is ranked.. Wasn't Zab undisputed champ before Williams even won a belt and before Cotto beat anybody of note? Didn't Floyd beat both him and his conqueror? Didn't you just say Leonard beat the best at his time? Well, when Mayweather won the WW crown, that was the best at his time. How is that "handpicking" is what I asked. Cotto was moving up, PW wasn't thought of.
I never knew that and never even said it before the fight. I don't fit in that lame category that would discredit Hatton, especially as a smart fan and objective person. I'd never use such a word to describe an undefeated champ either, I just find it so silly and ******. Especially when he was ranked #8 by the Ring.
Now he's a bit beaten. Against Mayweather and Baldy, he was Champion. Well, against Baldy, but May beat him too.
So I guess street thugs held belts at 140 and 147 then.
.. You sound worse than the rest of the loser Floyd bashers. You think you're being honest, but don't make any sense. That doesn't get you honor.
I doubt that I'd beat up Baldy if the undisputed champ couldn't, along with the last 17 people before..
you think .... baldomir ...zab... hatton... are better than cotto or williams...all put together...
we all knew hatton was a bum..
as is zab...
zab only beats up street thugs...lol..
.. You sound worse than the rest of the loser Floyd bashers. You think you're being honest, but don't make any sense. That doesn't get you honor.
and baldomir is a walking statue...you could beat baldomir..although i doubt by knock out...lol....

Comment