Who has the better legacy, Pacquiao or Mayweather?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • heder
    Up and Comer
    • Sep 2007
    • 80
    • 9
    • 1
    • 6,120

    #101
    Originally posted by lefhooktodabody
    I'll say Floyd. Pac's biggest wins are against older fighters who are past their best.
    age is not an excuse for losing – muhammad ali was 32 when he knocked out undefeated champion george foreman, 24 in ‘The Rumble In the Jungle’ in kinshasa, zaire in october 1974, in case you didn't know that.

    Comment

    • joepal
      Banned
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Sep 2007
      • 2267
      • 38
      • 0
      • 2,461

      #102
      Originally posted by The_Bringer
      You will not hear me disagree that Barrera is a greater win than Castillo. But that also doesn't discredit Castillo at all, he was still one of the best of his generation. Mayweather took on Corrales at a time when Corrales was undefeated and nobody wanted anything to do with him, and he embarassed him and made it look easy.

      Morales and Barrera both were past their primes when Pac beat them, the same as Oscar was past him when Mayweather beat him. Overall I think Mayweathers record coupled with being an undefeated Champion in 5 different weightclasses is better than Pacquiao's record against 2 old legends.
      Pac has beaten a lot of champs before. Man Corrales had legal problems in the Floyd fight. And no, Morales and MAB were not old. Way to go to discredit Pac's wins.

      Pac wouldve beaten MAB or Morales AT ANY TIME in their career. For example Pac KOd Reynante Jamili in just 2 minutes, a guy who made a competitive fight with Morales more than five years ago. And InjinChi himself said that Pac was a great fighter that's why he didnt fight him. Couple that with Pac's triple KOwins over Morales while also KOing Morales equal Barrera, CAN YOU HONESTLY SAY WITH A STRAIGHT FACE THAT MORALES WOULDVE BEATEN PACQUIAO AT ANY TIME? That is w/ out the benefit of a headbutt of course.

      Comment

      • Dirt E Gomez
        ***Stupendous***
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jul 2005
        • 9976
        • 952
        • 1,092
        • 18,863

        #103
        Originally posted by joepal
        Pac wouldve beaten MAB or Morales AT ANY TIME in their career.
        Stop posting.

        Comment

        • ßringer
          **** Subtlety
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jun 2006
          • 28180
          • 2,785
          • 2,762
          • 48,350

          #104
          Originally posted by joepal
          Pac has beaten a lot of champs before. Man Corrales had legal problems in the Floyd fight. And no, Morales and MAB were not old. Way to go to discredit Pac's wins.

          Pac wouldve beaten MAB or Morales AT ANY TIME in their career. For example Pac KOd Reynante Jamili in just 2 minutes, a guy who made a competitive fight with Morales more than five years ago. And InjinChi himself said that Pac was a great fighter that's why he didnt fight him. Couple that with Pac's triple KOwins over Morales while also KOing Morales equal Barrera, CAN YOU HONESTLY SAY WITH A STRAIGHT FACE THAT MORALES WOULDVE BEATEN PACQUIAO AT ANY TIME? That is w/ out the benefit of a headbutt of course.
          There's so much bull**** in bold right there I need some boots just to get into it.

          MORALES BEAT PACQUIAO IN THEIR FIRST FIGHT! What the hell are you smoking, Pac didn't KO Morales 3 times? He got schooled in their first fight, and KO'd Morales in the following 2.

          Comment

          • joepal
            Banned
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Sep 2007
            • 2267
            • 38
            • 0
            • 2,461

            #105
            Originally posted by The_Bringer
            There's so much bull**** in bold right there I need some boots just to get into it.

            MORALES BEAT PACQUIAO IN THEIR FIRST FIGHT! What the hell are you smoking, Pac didn't KO Morales 3 times? He got schooled in their first fight, and KO'd Morales in the following 2.
            Now you tell me that Morales schooled Pac in the first fight. Further proof that you're just hating on Pac.

            Pac threw just as many punches as Morales in the first fight. And these were a lot MORE POWERFUL PUNCHES than the ones Morales threw.

            You cant call that a schooling, unless you're a hater.

            Comment

            • joepal
              Banned
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Sep 2007
              • 2267
              • 38
              • 0
              • 2,461

              #106
              Originally posted by Dirt E Gomez
              Stop posting.
              Go fek yerslef.

              Comment

              • Dirt E Gomez
                ***Stupendous***
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Jul 2005
                • 9976
                • 952
                • 1,092
                • 18,863

                #107
                Originally posted by joepal
                Now you tell me that Morales schooled Pac in the first fight. Further proof that you're just hating on Pac.

                Pac threw just as many punches as Morales in the first fight. And these were a lot MORE POWERFUL PUNCHES than the ones Morales threw.

                You cant call that a schooling, unless you're a hater.
                So do you actually know anything about the sport of boxing? I'm don't mean this to be insulting.. it's a serious question. Do you actually know anything about scoring, its history, and other particular rules?

                From all of your posts I figure these are actually a valid questions.

                Comment

                • joepal
                  Banned
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Sep 2007
                  • 2267
                  • 38
                  • 0
                  • 2,461

                  #108
                  Originally posted by heder
                  age is not an excuse for losing – muhammad ali was 32 when he knocked out undefeated champion george foreman, 24 in ‘The Rumble In the Jungle’ in kinshasa, zaire in october 1974, in case you didn't know that.
                  Yeah, the thing is Pac beats a great fighter THEN ALL THE HATERS BRAND HIM AS OLD. What a convenient way to put down a fighter.

                  Comment

                  • joepal
                    Banned
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Sep 2007
                    • 2267
                    • 38
                    • 0
                    • 2,461

                    #109
                    Originally posted by Dirt E Gomez
                    So do you actually know anything about the sport of boxing? I'm don't mean this to be insulting.. it's a serious question. Do you actually know anything about scoring, its history, and other particular rules?

                    From all of your posts I figure these are actually a valid questions.
                    For all your posts I figure you're just another Pac Hater.

                    Oh it must so much everytime you see him fight, no?

                    Comment

                    • Fly High
                      Up and Comer
                      Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
                      • May 2007
                      • 53
                      • 4
                      • 0
                      • 6,087

                      #110
                      P4P #1 is PAC

                      Paquiao gave us entertaining and convincing wins such as fights against Morales and MAB. While the other guy, Floyd gave us boring, questionable and unsatisfactory fights against Castillo and Dela Hoya. He would be better entertaining us in NFL playing as running back, wat da ya tink?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP