Dont make moronic statements then. What other than Lacy's loss to Calzaghe and an unconvincing serious injury plagued return bout has made him look 'not very good' exactly? The entire boxing world, critics, analysts, fans all thought that Lacy was the new biggest things, are they wrong and your analysis that he's 'not very good' correct?
I respect your views about Froch being a good fighter...because he is. However, he is also still unproven, has not fought for any kind of credible title and has not fought another legitimately credible opponent. Can you deny this at all?
He may, he may not. Everyone was rabbiting on about his incredible power (mini-Tyson) and how he was too strong and too fast for Calzaghe. It didnt happen. There is no guarantee that Froch would be any more successful in landing on Calzaghe. If he could land against another top guy in the division, that'd be some evidence...but he hasnt fought any other top guy in the division yet.
I respect your views about Froch being a good fighter...because he is. However, he is also still unproven, has not fought for any kind of credible title and has not fought another legitimately credible opponent. Can you deny this at all?
He may, he may not. Everyone was rabbiting on about his incredible power (mini-Tyson) and how he was too strong and too fast for Calzaghe. It didnt happen. There is no guarantee that Froch would be any more successful in landing on Calzaghe. If he could land against another top guy in the division, that'd be some evidence...but he hasnt fought any other top guy in the division yet.
Comment