Can John Tate really gave Holmes a tough fight and possibly a loss

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • QueensburyRules
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • May 2018
    • 21793
    • 2,347
    • 17
    • 187,708

    #31
    --- let's start with Ali vs Terrell.

    You next...

    Comment

    • JAB5239
      Dallas Cowboys
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Dec 2007
      • 27708
      • 5,034
      • 4,436
      • 73,018

      #32
      Originally posted by QueensburyRules
      --- let's start with Ali vs Terrell.

      You next...
      We're talking about the late 70's to the mid 80's of Holmes career and you pull out a fight from 1967? Lmao!

      Comment

      • QueensburyRules
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • May 2018
        • 21793
        • 2,347
        • 17
        • 187,708

        #33
        --- Spltting of titles in the Lar era, so it fell on kid genius Tyson to unify the belts in the 80s.

        You next, but you've been derilect and missing in action thus far...

        Comment

        • JAB5239
          Dallas Cowboys
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Dec 2007
          • 27708
          • 5,034
          • 4,436
          • 73,018

          #34
          Originally posted by QueensburyRules
          --- Spltting of titles in the Lar era, so it fell on kid genius Tyson to unify the belts in the 80s.

          You next, but you've been derilect and missing in action thus far...
          My friend, you're ignoring the fact that it was nearly impossible to make a unification fight at that time. It took a massive draw like Tyson to do so. You're also ignoring the fact that historians and trainers all rank Holmes as one of the greatest heavyweights ever.

          Comment

          • Anthony342
            Undisputed Champion
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Jan 2010
            • 11801
            • 1,461
            • 355
            • 102,713

            #35
            Originally posted by JAB5239
            My friend, you're ignoring the fact that it was nearly impossible to make a unification fight at that time. It took a massive draw like Tyson to do so. You're also ignoring the fact that historians and trainers all rank Holmes as one of the greatest heavyweights ever.
            Not to mention the fact that Larry Holmes was still lineal champion during the first half of the '80s.

            Comment

            • Anthony342
              Undisputed Champion
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Jan 2010
              • 11801
              • 1,461
              • 355
              • 102,713

              #36
              And it sounds like John Tate would have about as much chance as Larry Tate of beating Holmes.

              Comment

              • OctoberRed
                Undisputed Champion
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Aug 2006
                • 14251
                • 797
                • 295
                • 135,200

                #37
                Originally posted by Anthony342
                And it sounds like John Tate would have about as much chance as Larry Tate of beating Holmes.
                Or my Neighbor Bobby Tate

                Comment

                • JAB5239
                  Dallas Cowboys
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Dec 2007
                  • 27708
                  • 5,034
                  • 4,436
                  • 73,018

                  #38
                  Originally posted by OctoberRed
                  Or my Neighbor Bobby Tate
                  Or Sharon Tate.

                  Comment

                  • TBear
                    Lords of Boxingscene
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Apr 2008
                    • 113272
                    • 6,077
                    • 12,778
                    • 1,665,677,098

                    #39
                    I remember watching Tate against Coetzee in that ice rink in South Africa(ring was super slippery) and the first 12 rounds with Weaver and thinking that Tate might be able to box with Holmes. Later in that fight and after the thought never entered my mind. Back then the rap on Tate was his chin but I always thought it was his endurance. Something he couldn't do without against Holmes.

                    Comment

                    • TBear
                      Lords of Boxingscene
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Apr 2008
                      • 113272
                      • 6,077
                      • 12,778
                      • 1,665,677,098

                      #40
                      Originally posted by QueensburyRules
                      --- It's inarguable that fat Lar wouldn't go near a WBA champ during his run for good reason.

                      The poor dear has something like a 1-5 title record against standing champs. The only one he beat was norton who had been appointed the WBC title after his eliminator w/ Young. Wouldn't touch young either.
                      While Holmes was champ he defeated three fighters that went on to win the WBA title while he was still champion.

                      He might have fought Young but Young was upset by Ocasio. Holmes defended against Ocasio soon after.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP