Hagler vs Other ATG Middleweights

[sonnyboyx2]

Thulani Malinga - 2 time world champion?.......super middle 168 S. African Champ. Thats like being the champion of Texas maybe. Never held a World Title.

Vaca, hahaha seriously the guy was stopped like 25 Times, the majority of his fights were 147! He fought in Mexico and was an opponent for the majority of his career. 65W 26 L with 21 KO loses.

Jorge Castro, I mentioned Castro as a good fighter in my post. He won a title (WBA) by elimination and held it for ONE year! Good fighter not exactly a great champion.

Bernard Hopkins ...fought the vast majority of his bouts prior to the Jones match as a "super middleweight"! He never had any title when he fought Jones in fact it took him 7 or 8 years to win his first world title after meeting Jones.

So there are NO Titlists fighting Jones!!!

Are you accepting my challenge? Elroy ran and juggy is still hiding. Maybe your right and I don't have any credentials at all. Maybe I'm just a BS like you!

Do you want to find out? Buck up sonny you talk big but you know you ain't sh*!. ......... gutless!

Ray

what is your challenge you keep going on about ??

I knew you would rubbish the four fighters Jones beat who went on to be World Champions LOL Malinga beat Robin Reid & Nigel Benn to be a 2 time WBC Champion... so once again you have been proven wrong Walter Mitty.

[sonnyboyx2]

Don't hold your breath. He is known for making comments like "Ketchel carried Langford" without offering any credible evidence. I've recently read a biography about Langford that doesn't verify that at all.

why should i have to provide any evidence?.. do you provide evidence of everything you claim on this forum?... Anything i make claim of is always 100% spot on unlike yourself, who talks garbage every post you make.

[joeandthebums]

Look it up Joe i'm sure you will come across it

Have read Ketchel biography versions of him being held back until he do so no more before beating Langford to a pulp.

Was interested in the new evidence.

[sonnyboyx2]

Have read Ketchel biography versions of him being held back until he do so no more before beating Langford to a pulp.

Was interested in the new evidence.

I have read it on a couple of occasions Joe, i'm sure there is a book recently released on the 6rd exhibition making the claim. However, here is a link you may find of interest on the matter which is unrelated to the book.

http://www.boxing.com/did_langford_really_carry_ketchel_in_1910_superfight.html

[joeandthebums]

I have read it on a couple of occasions Joe, i'm sure there is a book recently released on the 6rd exhibition making the claim. However, here is a link you may find of interest on the matter which is unrelated to the book.

http://www.boxing.com/did_langford_r...uperfight.html

Balanced article.

[billeau2]

LOL.....i lied about a fight-film collection?

You were caught lying about meeting mike Tyson thats a fact. You were laughed at for the claim you make about your film collection because it is a virtual impossability which was explained to you. You claiming you caught Ray is slander, you did no such thing.

Thats the difference. That and you have been proven a lyer before. Sure you can disparage someone and claim they are lying but when you claim you "caught them out" you are once again ( I must add), lying.

[Scott9945]

why would a Langford biography claim Ketchel had the better of Sam?

Why wouldn't it? It's not like the writer had a connection to Langford or any motivation to misrepresent the story. Both parties have been dead for a very long time now. And the evidence you offer in a later post doesn't indicate that Ketchel went any easier than Langford did.

[Scott9945]

why should i have to provide any evidence?.. do you provide evidence of everything you claim on this forum?... Anything i make claim of is always 100% spot on unlike yourself, who talks garbage every post you make.

Because you have been proven to be a liar countless times by innumerable people. Everyone is aware of this expect possibly you. Most write that off as you being delusional enough to believe your own lies.

[sonnyboyx2]

You were caught lying about meeting mike Tyson thats a fact. You were laughed at for the claim you make about your film collection because it is a virtual impossability which was explained to you. You claiming you caught Ray is slander, you did no such thing.

Thats the difference. That and you have been proven a lyer before. Sure you can disparage someone and claim they are lying but when you claim you "caught them out" you are once again ( I must add), lying.

Not at all, i made claim i was going to attend "An Evening with Mike Tyson" which included a photograph taken with him. I said, "i would ask him if he knew Ray Corso" while getting the photograph done... unfortunately Tyson had to cancel.... Of course in your book that equates to me lying LOL..

What i find really fasinating about this forum, is how only myself debates and posts about boxing, i kinda debate with myself. By answering all the doubters. The rest of the clowns who infest this forum, do so because they are lonely. Guys like Billeau1 who is a lonely little midget. Who never talks boxing, just throws out insults with no substance to them.. if i stay off the forum for a week or so, there is no more than a couple of posts in that time. It's like "The Clowns" only turn up to doubt, ridicule and slander. I think the reason the clowns do this is they aren't boxing guys. They are gay.

But as for seeing Mike Tyson.. I seen him fight live`

[sonnyboyx2]

You were caught lying about meeting mike Tyson thats a fact. You were laughed at for the claim you make about your film collection because it is a virtual impossability which was explained to you. You claiming you caught Ray is slander, you did no such thing.

Thats the difference. That and you have been proven a lyer before. Sure you can disparage someone and claim they are lying but when you claim you "caught them out" you are once again ( I must add), lying.

Lets talk about my fight-film collection