In other words....
Well, Butterfly, in reponse to your questions and concerns......I did say ....."If we leave ALL hype behind and all egos and favorites behind and counter-scenarios of who would have won out of any Heavyweight Champion in the History of Boxing and look at JUST the records".
I am not for any Heavyweight Boxer nor do I have favorites cause I have my dislikes of every boxer regardless of weight-class. But, for the record, WINNING IS WINNING and Rocky marciano PROVED that he was the greatest of his era, not ducking ANYONE who challenged him including an aged Joe Louis. My take on Marciano fighting Louis: If you're tough enough to talk **** and step in the damn ring even at that age Louis was, you'd better bring your A+ Fighting Game cause that's your ass if you lose. The same goes for Walcott and Charles, I don't care if you're a Middleweight or Light-Heavyweight, if you think you're the ****, then PROVE it in the RING. Obviously, they couldn't against Marciano. And---it doesn't matter if Marciano was losing to Walcott, who eventually won is what counts......Oh yeah, Marciano by KO, not mostly decisions like Ali.
Another reason why I think Ali is not the greatest is him having physical advantages over other fighters:
1. Ali ALWAYS used his REACH to his benefit, he hardly ever had to duck or bob and weave to get in ANY of his opponents. (83" Reach)
2. He was a tall Heavyweight (6' 3") that towered over the 5'11 Joe Frazier who knocked Ali out.....***
-----------------------------------------------------------------
In the replying words of Roger Mayweather to Antonio Margarito as he talked Mayweather down and saying he could beat him in his Prime......."You ain't even in my time, Know Ya' DAMN HISTORY!"
Well, Butterfly, in reponse to your questions and concerns......I did say ....."If we leave ALL hype behind and all egos and favorites behind and counter-scenarios of who would have won out of any Heavyweight Champion in the History of Boxing and look at JUST the records".
I am not for any Heavyweight Boxer nor do I have favorites cause I have my dislikes of every boxer regardless of weight-class. But, for the record, WINNING IS WINNING and Rocky marciano PROVED that he was the greatest of his era, not ducking ANYONE who challenged him including an aged Joe Louis. My take on Marciano fighting Louis: If you're tough enough to talk **** and step in the damn ring even at that age Louis was, you'd better bring your A+ Fighting Game cause that's your ass if you lose. The same goes for Walcott and Charles, I don't care if you're a Middleweight or Light-Heavyweight, if you think you're the ****, then PROVE it in the RING. Obviously, they couldn't against Marciano. And---it doesn't matter if Marciano was losing to Walcott, who eventually won is what counts......Oh yeah, Marciano by KO, not mostly decisions like Ali.
Another reason why I think Ali is not the greatest is him having physical advantages over other fighters:
1. Ali ALWAYS used his REACH to his benefit, he hardly ever had to duck or bob and weave to get in ANY of his opponents. (83" Reach)
2. He was a tall Heavyweight (6' 3") that towered over the 5'11 Joe Frazier who knocked Ali out.....***
-----------------------------------------------------------------
In the replying words of Roger Mayweather to Antonio Margarito as he talked Mayweather down and saying he could beat him in his Prime......."You ain't even in my time, Know Ya' DAMN HISTORY!"

Comment