Originally posted by jabsRstiff
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Leonard vs Duran 1
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by jabsRstiff View PostThat's not actually true. A truly devastating puncher would get a guy out of there before an accumulation of punches could wreak such havoc.
Of the two (Benn and McCLellan) McClellan was the more murderous puncher.
There is a belief that part of what damaged McClellan was him dehydrating to make weight. This was not an issue in his previous bouts because he was dusting guys early.
Comment
-
Originally posted by joseph5620 View Post...What was the general vibe going into this fight in terms of what fighter the experts were picking and how the fight would go? What was your prediction? Thanks.
From my perspective, the most remarkable thing about the match had little to do with the action inside the ring, but the overwhelming fan support at the arena for Duran, despite the odds against him and Leonard's Olympic history at Montreal. The resounding cheers for Duran and smattering of boos amid the cheers for Leonard during the introductions portended what was to follow.
Pre-fight Anticipation
[vbtube]9SwxhqOpA1M[/vbtube]
A Microcosm of "The Brawl in Montreal"
[vbtube]jZnsDfrnZjY[/vbtube]
Comment
-
Duran didn't just work Leonard over on the inside, he outclassed him from all ranges. SRL was knocked across the ring most notably twice - in the 2nd and 4th - on a perfectly timed and measured left hook and a counter right hand over Leonard's jab and both shots were from distance. Always felt Duran won that fight thanks largely in part to his superior defense and counterpunching, ironically. It's no surprise he'd get the better of it in-close, but it's the former that made the key difference. If that fight was really the toe-to-toe slugfest people make it out to be, Duran would've been KO'ed cold. Leonard found him impossibly elusive at points, which says a lot considering how fast he could let his hands go.
Comment
-
-
-
-
Originally posted by jabsRstiff View PostThat's not actually true. A truly devastating puncher would get a guy out of there before an accumulation of punches could wreak such havoc.
Of the two (Benn and McCLellan) McClellan was the more murderous puncher.
There is a belief that part of what damaged McClellan was him dehydrating to make weight. This was not an issue in his previous bouts because he was dusting guys early.
So, with McClellan being a more murderous puncher, was this fight expected to be a slugfest going into it? Was that what most people were predicting at the time? I got a Benn set somewhere, it's one of the few career sets I still have to watch. Sounds like this is one of his best fights.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Anthony342 View PostOh okay. McClellan was the guy that went blind, partially deaf and uses a cane and used to be in a wheelchair. Man, now that's a hard puncher to be able to do that to a guy.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Anthony342 View Posthmm, interesting. Or, I suppose, a truly devastating puncher could do that kind of damage in a shorter period of time after landing a lot fewer punches.
So, with McClellan being a more murderous puncher, was this fight expected to be a slugfest going into it? Was that what most people were predicting at the time? I got a Benn set somewhere, it's one of the few career sets I still have to watch. Sounds like this is one of his best fights.
Then you could have an average puncher he tags you on the chin when you dont expect it who puts you away just like that.
Comment
Comment