Originally posted by frankenfrank
View Post
Did you say Kingpetch was at the end of his prime? Ummm, he was right in the middle of his peak fighting the best he ever had. He had just beaten the legendary Pascual Perez twice and would go on to beat Ebihara after Harada and regain the Flyweight title twice.
Ebihara himself....Considering they both had the same amount of fights and experience, it was what it was. A great win over a future HOFer when both were at the start of their careers.
Do you know anything about Rudkin, Caraballo, Medel, Aoki and Herrera? Surely you'd know about Rudkin being the UK. He was a heroic figure. You'd have to remember his and McGowan's fights?
I don't know see what Ray Leonard, Mike Tyson and The Fat Jamoc have to do with the 60's era of bantamweights. What I can tell you though is that Hagler retired straight after losing to Leonard and Mike Tyson was shot and never have another good win from Holyfield to Lewis. You're comparing that to Jofre and Medel and Kingpetch who all went onto beat legendary fighters and who had all just beaten greats too?
Do you know what Jofre went on to do for the next ten years after losing to Harada? He beat some of the greatest ever FW's and never lost another fight winning the FW title in the process.
One thing you need to consider greatly with boxing Frank: Age is completely irrelevant to different fighters. Foreman won the HW title at 45, 20 or so years after winning it the first time. Duran won the MW title at 37, 17 years after winning the LW title. Benitez beat the great HOFer Cervantes at 17, HOFer Palomino at 20 and was getting knocked out by a 13-1 Davey Moore at 25. Because he was younger than Cervantes, Palomino etc etc, does it mean his wins don't count?
Medel is considered one of the greats to never win a title. Between '59 and '67 he lost only a few fights. To Jofre, Harada, Ray Asis and Manny Barrios. The last two he avenged and both were excellent contenders of the day...ie. they were better than guys like Malignaggi today. As I said, they were his only losses between '59 and '67 and in that time he beat greats such as Jesus Pimental, Harada, Sadao Yaoita, Jose Lopez etc. Not exactly past it.
Caraballo was one of the great fighters of that time. Beat such greats as Pascual Perez, Carlos Miranda, Pinto, who was undefeated at 50-0 and was one of the great Brazilian fighters. Piero Rollo etc etc. His only loss in fifty fights was to Jofre before Harada.
This is getting boring.....Do you even know any of these guys? Because I know that all you're going to do is say "They are all **** wins and don't mean anything. None of them are any good and I've never even heard of them. I looked on boxrec and they have like ten losses! PWN lamo!!!"
Herrera beat Joe Brown and Ismael Laguna. Great fighter
Rudkin was a great fighter. Ask one of the old Green Teefs here about him. They'll all remember him well.
Aoki was a great fighter too, and this was probably during one of Japan's great run of fighters. They were all over the lower weight classes at that time and were all damn good. You could pick and choose between a bunch of other guys though....Dwight Hawkins was very good, Ray Asis was very good, Nobuo Chiba was good, Saito was good. These were all top contenders....You know? Top contender back then is the same as a titlist now. Good fighters for the most part, some better, some ok, some very good. But all world class.
Imagine Ali's HW era. That is what Harada's BW era was. That's how good it was. All the guys were ****ing incredible fighters all fighting at the same time and all fighting each other. The standouts were Harada and Jofre and they are serious greats who fought and beat everybody and ruled in the toughest BW era ever.
It really doesn't get that much better than Harada who is one of the greats of the game and one of the most brutal offensive machines to ever fight. Period.
Comment