Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Tyson v Foreman who wins in 1991?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by BKM- View Post

    Terrible examples. Morrison and Holyfield used movement around Foreman and avoided him in-close.

    Tyson has never fought like that and his one dimensional style didn't allow him to. he could only go 1 direction and that is a suicide mission against Foreman.
    LOL, Cus D'amato's fighter was a lot of things, but one-dimensional wasn't it.

    He was one of the quickest, fastest, most versatile punchers there's ever been.

    He had power in both hands & could fight out of both stanses

    He was a great combination puncher

    IF you think he just had to sit there & let Foreman attack him, you aint watch him.
    Mr Mitts Mr Mitts likes this.

    Comment


    • #12
      I think Tyson likely takes care of an old man with a gut. George wanted no part of Tyson.

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by QueensburyRules View Post

        - - Slugger Tommy on he bike the whole fight with his back turned.

        In 91 Mike KO Razor Ruddock and then beat him up in the rematch.

        Big George KOs Razor both times.

        They couldn't fight in 91 because...

        1. DKing control Tyson
        2. Not enough $$$ close to matching the $22mil split purse the Chinese were offering in 89 before Tiananmen Square massacre...simples...
        The Chinese offered a total of 25 mil to host the fight in a proposal. There was no deal in place. Still, that only 12.5 mil apiece.

        https://www.nytimes.com/1989/06/02/s...id%20yesterday.

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post

          The Chinese offered a total of 25 mil to host the fight in a proposal. There was no deal in place. Still, that only 12.5 mil apiece.

          https://www.nytimes.com/1989/06/02/s...id%20yesterday.
          The Sanctioning Bodies were kidding themselves if they thought they could pressure Foreman into fighting Biggs first. That's laughable. Probably scared the Chinese might not be much interested in paying sanctioning fees.

          This NYTs article, June 2nd, appeared one day before the June 3rd and 4th massacre.

          Then 'Tank man' occured on June 5th.

          I suspect there was no more talk after that?
          Last edited by Willie Pep 229; 05-29-2025, 09:49 PM.

          Comment


          • #15
            Tyson by UD as well.But he don't want fight against Big George.Don't understand why.

            Comment


            • #16
              Foreman was disfigured by Alex Stewart in April 1992, not too long after 1991 then.

              Draw your own conclusions.



              Mr Mitts Mr Mitts likes this.

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post

                The Chinese offered a total of 25 mil to host the fight in a proposal. There was no deal in place. Still, that only 12.5 mil apiece.

                https://www.nytimes.com/1989/06/02/s...id%20yesterday.
                - - They had a deal and contract that was cancelled after Tiananmen Square Massacre that made China into a no fly zone from the US.

                U minder quit again?

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by The D3vil View Post

                  LOL, Cus D'amato's fighter was a lot of things, but one-dimensional wasn't it.

                  He was one of the quickest, fastest, most versatile punchers there's ever been.

                  He had power in both hands & could fight out of both stanses

                  He was a great combination puncher

                  IF you think he just had to sit there & let Foreman attack him, you aint watch him.
                  That style was the very definition of one dimensional. If your only way to fight is to go forward with the same set of offense and defence, you are one dimensional.

                  It means that if you face even one guy big and strong enough to put you on the back foot, you're screwed. Because you will never be in balance for your offense.

                  This flasy style relies on being in mid range where you can hit your opponent while he can't hit you. As soon as Tyson is in mid range, he will be grappled by Foreman and he will never get set, have his offense muffled and be met with short hooks and uppercuts.

                  After even 2 or 3 moments of that in the opening round, Tyson will be desperate, get sloppy and lose his mind. I doubt this goes past round 1 and definitely not beyond round 2.

                  He literally is making the fight easier for Foreman who is an expert at cutting off the ring to land his offense. You could have asked Joe Frazier about that.

                  This style was very flashy but required a genetic freak to make it work, and it's so taxing on the body you will have a short career, and again if you meet a big slugger who can't be bullied and loves to take you into his world in close, you are screwed. That is why so many boxers learned this style but very few made it successful. It's very overrated.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by QueensburyRules View Post

                    - - They had a deal and contract that was cancelled after Tiananmen Square Massacre that made China into a no fly zone from the US.

                    U minder quit again?
                    It was canceled because Foreman didn't want to deal with King. And it was only a proposal. If there was a contract you should be able to show a link to it. You won't because you can't. You don't deal in facts or logic, only inebriated delusions.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by BKM- View Post

                      That style was the very definition of one dimensional. If your only way to fight is to go forward with the same set of offense and defence, you are one dimensional.

                      It means that if you face even one guy big and strong enough to put you on the back foot, you're screwed. Because you will never be in balance for your offense.

                      This flasy style relies on being in mid range where you can hit your opponent while he can't hit you. As soon as Tyson is in mid range, he will be grappled by Foreman and he will never get set, have his offense muffled and be met with short hooks and uppercuts.

                      After even 2 or 3 moments of that in the opening round, Tyson will be desperate, get sloppy and lose his mind. I doubt this goes past round 1 and definitely not beyond round 2.

                      He literally is making the fight easier for Foreman who is an expert at cutting off the ring to land his offense. You could have asked Joe Frazier about that.

                      This style was very flashy but required a genetic freak to make it work, and it's so taxing on the body you will have a short career, and again if you meet a big slugger who can't be bullied and loves to take you into his world in close, you are screwed. That is why so many boxers learned this style but very few made it successful. It's very overrated.


                      this is a good analysis and i think the style factors are correct but Foreman being slow footed in his 40s is a another factor and his ability to cut off the ring and prevent tyson from fighting at his distance is reduced and tysons speed on the way in means he is catching foreman a lot.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP