Tyson Fury?
Collapse
-
-
As many have said in this thread prime Fury had incredible movement and speed for a man of his vast size.
The Tyson of Wlad and Wilder 2 is a head to head nightmare for any heavyweight in history.
People seem to delight in ridiculing him now, but a shot version gave the superb Usyk two very good fights.
Oh and despite being down several times he has always got up.
Not many heavy champions can say the same.
Wilder is not a good heavyweight and either is a 40 year old Wlad.Comment
-
The only thing incredible about Tyson Fury is he is capable of boxing while being 50 lbs overweight and naturally low in muscle tone and strength. But p4p heâs not very good at all and wouldnât beat any good heavyweights with a pulse. He would get completely run over by the manassa Mauler that fought Willard. Knocked out cold sleeping.
Wilder is not a good heavyweight and either is a 40 year old Wlad.
The fight Tyson Fury lost? You decide! | Tyson Fury vs John McDermott I | Full Fight
Fury was 253 lbs for that fight.
Fury, at your projected 220lbs would look malnourished!
You say Fury is naturally low in strength,based on what? He bullied Whyte 253lbs and Chisora 260lbs.Comment
-
The only thing incredible about Tyson Fury is he is capable of boxing while being 50 lbs overweight and naturally low in muscle tone and strength. But p4p heâs not very good at all and wouldnât beat any good heavyweights with a pulse. He would get completely run over by the manassa Mauler that fought Willard. Knocked out cold sleeping.
Wilder is not a good heavyweight and either is a 40 year old Wlad.
I find that slightly distubing.
Prime Fury wpuld have boxed Jack and Rocky's arses off and stopped them in the middle rrounds at the latest.
Comment
-
The only thing incredible about Tyson Fury is he is capable of boxing while being 50 lbs overweight and naturally low in muscle tone and strength. But p4p heâs not very good at all and wouldnât beat any good heavyweights with a pulse. He would get completely run over by the manassa Mauler that fought Willard. Knocked out cold sleeping.
Wilder is not a good heavyweight and either is a 40 year old Wlad.Comment
-
Now we'll get revisionist history where Tyson has slowed down and used to be perfect. People will conveniently forget his boxing got him floored by Wilder and that's why he brought in dirty boxing, and they will claim he dances less now because he got old not because he's being safer than ever.
At no point in time did Tyson Fury have the talent to beat Usyk. He hardly had the talent to beat Wilder for Christs' sake. He got exposed on talent and went for size advantage. Usyk took that away from him, and did it as the smaller man.
So yeah, I'm fully prepare to read about Fury slowed down like as if that's a bad thing and that BS he does didn't get him looking at lights against a low skill opponent.
As many have said in this thread prime Fury had incredible movement and speed for a man of his vast size.
The Tyson of Wlad and Wilder 2 is a head to head nightmare for any heavyweight in history.
People seem to delight in ridiculing him now, but a shot version gave the superb Usyk two very good fights.
Oh and despite being down several times he has always got up.
Not many heavy champions can say the same.
Now we pretend Fury didn't slow down because admitting you exaggerated the movement in the first place is too difficult for you?
This man who moved so great for such a big man got floored then changed his style, Floored, not aged.Comment
-
Comment
-
The only moron here is your mom for not aborting you. Why would I debate a white guy who pretends to be a boxing fan. A white guy finally gets a belt after 50 years of black males dominating the sport and now white guys pretend to be boxing fans. I made a factual statement. There were 100's of boxers in the 1990's who were 6'6 250 pounds plus and nobody ever said they were super heavyweights or had a advantage. But now ESPN said 6'5 plus is a super heavyweight we have goofy white dudes like you come out the boondocks and repeat the same hilariously wrong information. I guess watching YouTubers talk about boxing made you a expert right?Comment
-
I defend Marciano because he is WAY better than people think he is. Thats all. I seem to be the only damn person on the forum that sees this. I get called every name in the book for it. I don't know if Marciano beats every HW in history. I don't know if he beats Johnson, or prime Charles or prime Louis.
When you guys say absurd statements about such a high caliber fighter it blows my mind thats all. You really don't know how good he actually was. Marciano was a one of a kind fighter. an all time great. Usyk is not on his level sorry.Last edited by them_apples; 01-10-2025, 11:40 PM.Comment
Comment