Originally posted by GhostofDempsey
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Greatest Ring General?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by QueensburyRules View Post
- - No, not compared to Ginsberg and Kerouac…
It is just your such an idiot you overlook things... Not my fault. How is your opinion obvious? Usually like 99% of time your opinion is absurd! I mean really... sheesh.
Comment
-
I never understood Queen's "Ginsberg and Kerouac" insult.
Just a beat poet and a an early "influencer" (before we coined the term.)
But I don't think: their works are that bad; that a comparison works as an insult.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Willie Pep 229 View PostI never understood Queen's "Ginsberg and Kerouac" insult.
Just a beat poet and a an early "influencer" (before we coined the term.)
But I don't think: their works are that bad; that a comparison works as an insult.Bronson66 likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by DeeMoney View PostIf we are to define ring generalship as which fighter is controlling the action, the tempo, and making the fight be fought how they want to. Then who is the greatest ring general of all time?
Is it an aggressive fighter (Armstrong), a defensive type (Mayweather or Pep), a counter puncher (Moore) or someone who is a mix of skills?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Willie Pep 229 View PostI never understood Queen's "Ginsberg and Kerouac" insult.
Just a beat poet and a an early "influencer" (before we coined the term.)
But I don't think: their works are that bad; that a comparison works as an insult.
Comment
-
-
-
Of guys I've seen in my lifetime, I'd go with Floyd Mayweather Jr. & Bernard Hopkins.
I've never watched a fight with either where I felt that they were out of control.
Usually, they were mentally in control of all of their fights.
All-time, I'd be tempted to go with Muhammad Ali, who knew how to mentally fxck his opponent & demoralize them fighting off the back foot until they were adequately fxcked & he could finish them.
Comment
Comment