Originally posted by billeau2
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Is Moorer Hall of fame worthy?
Collapse
-
-
[QUOTE=QueensburyRules;n31821872]
- - More than a bad night. Moorer retired Field from boxing.
That's a Syronora night...zzzzzzzz[/QUOTE
Holyfield came back a year later. Regained the title by beating Mike Tyson twice including one time making him quit and what happened in 1997 when Holyfield and Moorer had their rematch. Exactly.
Comment
-
[QUOTE=MikeyMike100;n31822033]Originally posted by QueensburyRules View Post
- - More than a bad night. Moorer retired Field from boxing.
That's a Syronora night...zzzzzzzz[/QUOTE
Holyfield came back a year later. Regained the title by beating Mike Tyson twice including one time making him quit and what happened in 1997 when Holyfield and Moorer had their rematch. Exactly.
Comment
-
-
[QUOTE=MikeyMike100;n31822033]Originally posted by QueensburyRules View Post
- - More than a bad night. Moorer retired Field from boxing.
That's a Syronora night...zzzzzzzz[/QUOTE
Holyfield came back a year later. Regained the title by beating Mike Tyson twice including one time making him quit and what happened in 1997 when Holyfield and Moorer had their rematch. Exactly.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by MikeyMike100 View Post
Moorer doesn't have serious depth in his resume and will always be most known for getting knocked out by George Foreman
Doesn't matter. There are other things to consider when adding up a fighter's career campaign. A great example here; Moorer won the heavyweight championship of the world, the oldest and most international title in sports. Moorer fought for the title once held by John L. Sullivan, Jack Johnson, Jack Dempsey, Joe Louis, Rocky Marciano and Muhammad Ali, and won that title. Vitali Klitschko, as a recent example of a gifted heavyweight; fought for that title only once, and lost. History alway has the final say. Moorer is IN.ShoulderRoll likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by QueensburyRules View Post
- - Being the first southpaw is quite significant given the dearth of southpaws in boxing history because they had to convert to Orthodox in order to compete.
Imagine the Baseball HOF without southpaws, I mean it would be joke. Today Lefties hold near half the belts in spite of being a minority, approx 12% of the global population.
Head to head Moorer beats most hvy champs in history, and most certainly Ingo and Floyd, but that's strictly fantasy since every fighter is limited to the competition in his day.
David Tua never won a belt, but BTFO of Rahman and Ruiz who did hold belts as well as Moorer, yet Tua frozen out with just a single title challenge vs Lewie.
Knockouts have always been highly significant, taking it out of the judges' hands, I mean really!
No but just my opinion.
Comment
-
Originally posted by QueensburyRules View Post
- - Being the first southpaw is quite significant given the dearth of southpaws in boxing history because they had to convert to Orthodox in order to compete.
Imagine the Baseball HOF without southpaws, I mean it would be joke. Today Lefties hold near half the belts in spite of being a minority, approx 12% of the global population.
Head to head Moorer beats most hvy champs in history, and most certainly Ingo and Floyd, but that's strictly fantasy since every fighter is limited to the competition in his day.
David Tua never won a belt, but BTFO of Rahman and Ruiz who did hold belts as well as Moorer, yet Tua frozen out with just a single title challenge vs Lewie.
Knockouts have always been highly significant, taking it out of the judges' hands, I mean really!
Comment
-
Comment