Fury vs Usyk - Historic Impact??

[Willow The Wisp]

- - How is Wlad gonna get into Ring HOF?

Already know about IBHOF inductions that Ali, Wlad and others are in.

Losing the plot?

Yes. I have socks older than QueensburyRules. Catch me up.

[markusmod]

Yes. I have socks older than QueensburyRules. Catch me up.

Al Bundy level old? Hole on the big toe?

[QueensburyRules]

Yes. I have socks older than QueensburyRules. Catch me up.

- - I don't have any socks with as many holes in them as you, so please do pray tell us yet again how is Wlad gonna get into Ring HOF, and what relevance is that to the header?

We wanna know!!!

[JAB5239]

- - I don't have any socks with as many holes in them as you, so please do pray tell us yet again how is Wlad gonna get into Ring HOF, and what relevance is that to the header?

We wanna know!!!

Who did he beat that you rhink will get in?

[QueensburyRules]

Who did he beat that you rhink will get in?

- - I think, therefore you rhink is it?

Timeline comparison shows most of Wlad comp would beat most of Rocky, Patterson, and Sonny's for starters to keep this post WW2 relevant.

[JAB5239]

- - I think, therefore you rhink is it?

Timeline comparison shows most of Wlad comp would beat most of Rocky, Patterson, and Sonny's for starters to keep this post WW2 relevant.

Lol, so you are trying to determination whether his comp will get in the HOF based on how you THINK they would do against previous era's comp? Absolutely ridiculous. Why not base it on accomplishments and who they actually beat in their own era? This may be more a criteria for greatness, but I think it works here as well. You could of course take popularity into consideration since it is relevant to the HOF. So who do you have? Serious question. Of his opponents the only ones I see with a pissibility are Povetkin, Haye, Fury, with possible on AJ and Mormeck. I don't think any of the guys he beat are a shoe in though.

[QueensburyRules]

Lol, so you are trying to determination whether his comp will get in the HOF based on how you THINK they would do against previous era's comp? Absolutely ridiculous. Why not base it on accomplishments and who they actually beat in their own era? This may be more a criteria for greatness, but I think it works here as well. You could of course take popularity into consideration since it is relevant to the HOF. So who do you have? Serious question. Of his opponents the only ones I see with a pissibility are Povetkin, Haye, Fury, with possible on AJ and Mormeck. I don't think any of the guys he beat are a shoe in though.

- - You need a new writing program.

[JAB5239]

- - You need a new writing program.

Lol, you're such a tool.....totally afraid to show a list or answer a question that may leave you open to ridicule. It's way easier for you to hide anonymously behind a keyboard and troll.

[QueensburyRules]

Lol, you're such a tool.....totally afraid to show a list or answer a question that may leave you open to ridicule. It's way easier for you to hide anonymously behind a keyboard and troll.

- - Only historical impact of the thread header is Blubber shorts need changing, but minders in UK are hard to find, so may need your minder for his moment.

[shawnkemp804]

Lol Tyson Fury beat a faded Wladimir Klitschko, Deontay Wilder the least skilled heavyweight champion since Sonny Liston (the Modern Era). So some how that makes Tyson Fury a top 10 rated fighter? Even if he beats Uysk that should prove something? It would mean he beat a blown up Cruiserweight.

So if beating a blown up cruiser weight put you in the top 5 then wouldn't Michael Moorer be a top 5 heavyweight of all time since he beat Evander Holyfield? Also if beating a faded Wlad made you great then wouldn't Ross Purritty, Lamon Brewster, and Corrie Sanders all be top 5 all time greats since they beat a prime Wlad? Tyson Fury isn't good. He is just lucky enough to be in a really bad era for heavyweights.