Some who've actually seen em' are calling Tyson Fury the best ever.
Collapse
-
-
In 1922 Kearns tried to get Wills to sign onto a promise to negotiate which would have kept Wills (and therefore Rickard) bound for 60 days to a possible fight that Kearns had no obligation (or intention) of actually signing for.
Wills' people had no intention of binding themseleves, so they refused to sign. Kearns made sure the newspapers reported that Wills' people called off the negotiation. Which they technically did.
This seems like the same tactic. Fury has set up Usyk in the same manner. (And Nash Out is hauling water for the guise.) Fury can keep Usyk tied up in negotiations until Fury, chooses at his leisure, when or even if, he wants the fight.
This would ensure that no other 'championship' fight can be staged.
Maybe.
If this is Fury's tactic we may never get the fight.Comment
-
At one point Kearns did similar to Wills' people.
In 1922 Kearns tried to get Wills to sign onto a promise to negotiate which would have kept Wills (and therefore Rickard) bound for 60 days to a possible fight that Kearns had no obligation (or intention) of actually signing for.
Wills' people had no intention of binding themseleves, so they refused to sign. Kearns made sure the newspapers reported that Wills' people called off the negotiation. Which they technically did.
This seems like the same tactic. Fury has set up Usyk in the same manner. (And Nash Out is hauling water for the guise.) Fury can keep Usyk tied up in negotiations until Fury, chooses at his leisure, when or even if, he wants the fight.
This would ensure that no other 'championship' fight can be staged.
Maybe.
If this is Fury's tactic we may never get the fight.Comment
-
Skillwise, Tyson Fury is certainly not the best ever.
But his combination of size and ability is unique in heavyweight history. There has never been a heavyweight quite like him.Comment
-
At one point Kearns did similar to Wills' people.
In 1922 Kearns tried to get Wills to sign onto a promise to negotiate which would have kept Wills (and therefore Rickard) bound for 60 days to a possible fight that Kearns had no obligation (or intention) of actually signing for.
Wills' people had no intention of binding themseleves, so they refused to sign. Kearns made sure the newspapers reported that Wills' people called off the negotiation. Which they technically did.
This seems like the same tactic. Fury has set up Usyk in the same manner. (And Nash Out is hauling water for the guise.) Fury can keep Usyk tied up in negotiations until Fury, chooses at his leisure, when or even if, he wants the fight.
This would ensure that no other 'championship' fight can be staged.
Maybe.
If this is Fury's tactic we may never get the fight.Comment
-
Good post. A promise to negotiate is similar but different from the impasse encountered in the lastest rounds. For both sides of the table, the biggest considerations had to do with the presence of potential offers for x2, x3 the revenue from the Saudis for late in the year vs. The UK arrangement. Now it seems, businessmen in China are putting together something massive.
Maybe you will be correct in the end. The growing 'middle class' population of China is setting casino ******** records so it is possible that their revenue alone may be enough to make it a mega fight.
Still don't think, at this time, that it will sell in the Ststes. But it may not need US $.Comment
-
He looked no worse than Larry Holmes in a few of his title defenses. Ali too. We've become too caught up in heavyweights creating mushroom clouds. If it had of been many other fighters scoring the win as Joshua did the criticism would be far less.Comment
-
I don't see Fury knocking Ali out. Ali had one of the greatest chins in boxing. I do see a close fight though, and if Fury can use his reach advantage to work the jab and keep Ali off balance and at a distance he may be able to pull off a decision win. I hesitate to call a winner on this one.
I can see Fury beating Lewis by KO or decision. Lewis struggled with Vitali and if not for the cut he likely loses that fight. Fury is bigger, faster and has better overall movement than Vitali. I can also see Lewis dropping Fury on his trunks with a straight right hand that Fury gets up from. How does he do after that? I also circle back to Fury's fight with Wallin and how he struggled in that bout. Lewis is by far a better fighter than Wallin and certainly better than Wilder. I have to believe he gives Fury all he can handle and more.
Holmes would force this into a dogfight like he did with Norton. He would have get inside and pressure Fury non-stop. Use his counter-punching as he did with Cooney. Holmes already proved he can fight a bigger man in Cooney, I don't think he struggles with Fury's size at all. He got up off the canvas from Shavers best punch, I suspect he can do the same against Fury and possibly wins this fight.Comment
-
I don't see Fury knocking Ali out. Ali had one of the greatest chins in boxing. I do see a close fight though, and if Fury can use his reach advantage to work the jab and keep Ali off balance and at a distance he may be able to pull off a decision win. I hesitate to call a winner on this one.
I can see Fury beating Lewis by KO or decision. Lewis struggled with Vitali and if not for the cut he likely loses that fight. Fury is bigger, faster and has better overall movement than Vitali. I can also see Lewis dropping Fury on his trunks with a straight right hand that Fury gets up from. How does he do after that? I also circle back to Fury's fight with Wallin and how he struggled in that bout. Lewis is by far a better fighter than Wallin and certainly better than Wilder. I have to believe he gives Fury all he can handle and more.
Holmes would force this into a dogfight like he did with Norton. He would have get inside and pressure Fury non-stop. Use his counter-punching as he did with Cooney. Holmes already proved he can fight a bigger man in Cooney, I don't think he struggles with Fury's size at all. He got up off the canvas from Shavers best punch, I suspect he can do the same against Fury and possibly wins this fight.
IMO Fury is showing us a high ring IQ.
At the same time I think an Ali/Clay (circa 1967) would be a tougher fight for Fury than Holmes.
Unlike most HWs Ali had an even higher ring IQ than Fury and would find a way to control the pace of the fight and would steal yet another questionable UD.
Also as you say, you have to have a great chin when facing Fury. Ali, we agree had that.
So does Holmes of course (great chin), but I don't see Fury stopping Holmes just doing enough to take the UD.Last edited by Willie Pep 229; 04-19-2023, 12:39 PM.Comment
-
I have been rethinking the Fury-Chinaman fight.
Maybe you will be correct in the end. The growing 'middle class' population of China is setting casino ******** records so it is possible that their revenue alone may be enough to make it a mega fight.
Still don't think, at this time, that it will sell in the Ststes. But it may not need US $.Comment
Comment