Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Differentiating “style” from “skill”

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by them_apples View Post

    I literally meant your posts are arguing with made up ideas.

    I see you quote me and respond with something I wasn’t even saying or implying. Sometimes with some completely random fact that may or may not be true very limited poster in regards to arguing.

    an example of how you argue:

    them_apples: “the jab is the most important punch in boxing, rarely is it used as a knockout blow”

    war_room (response): “stop pretending you know boxing, a left hook to the liver is on the right side of the body not the left”

    what the **** do I respond to when you correct me on **** I wasn’t even saying or implying.

    Anyhow I’m here to talk about boxing not argue for the sake of arguing.
    Aww, look at sore loser make up an example that's the complete opposite of what happened. Way to try and shine a light on yourself.

    Hard to watch a man break down like this tbph.

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by War Room View Post

      Aww, look at sore loser make up an example that's the complete opposite of what happened. Way to try and shine a light on yourself.

      Hard to watch a man break down like this tbph.
      talking to yourself again lmao

      just mumbling about some victory all within your own head.

      You don’t know **** about boxing. 0 proof as well just an old mouth behind a screen.

      the way you worded it too sounds like a chump “was competitive” or however it went, thats what a noob would say when he got smacked around or they went easy on him. You never beat anyone up outside of a few kids maybe and got kicked out of the gym for doing so!

      still trying to figure out what you proved me wrong in

      Can someone else chime in? What did war room educate me in? Cause I don’t know he keeps mumbling to himself.

      you claim to be some experienced boxer but can’t differentiate style from skills. I said no plebs allowed then low and behold the biggest pleb shows up. You have 0 proof of any if this yet you are waving a victory flag poor senile old man fighting the mirror.
      Last edited by them_apples; 08-17-2022, 09:41 AM.
      billeau2 billeau2 likes this.

      Comment


      • #53
        Originally posted by them_apples View Post

        talking to yourself again lmao

        just mumbling about some victory all within your own head.

        You don’t know **** about boxing. 0 proof as well just an old mouth behind a screen.

        the way you worded it too sounds like a chump “was competitive” or however it went, thats what a noob would say when he got smacked around or they went easy on him. You never beat anyone up outside of a few kids maybe and got kicked out of the gym for doing so!

        still trying to figure out what you proved me wrong in

        Can someone else chime in? What did war room educate me in? Cause I don’t know he keeps mumbling to himself.

        you claim to be some experienced boxer but can’t differentiate style from skills. I said no plebs allowed then low and behold the biggest pleb shows up. You have 0 proof of any if this yet you are waving a victory flag poor senile old man fighting the mirror.
        I know what I'm talking about, you're the one who doesn't know the difference between styles and skills.

        This is embarassing now, look at you begging and pandering for someone to chime in and say that Hagler and Robinson share similarities. You've lost mate, dust yourself off and get better for the next one.

        It's funny how you said no plebs, when you were the pleb all along. The longer you drag this out, the longer you look like YDKSAB. I'm not the only one calling you out, IronDanHamza is kicking your **** in the dirt too. YSKSAB, end of story.

        You call Lamotta a boxer, then a brawler, clearly YDKSAB. You have no clue what an aging fighter looks like. Do I have to rehash everything ffs?

        Comment


        • #54
          Originally posted by them_apples View Post

          talking to yourself again lmao

          just mumbling about some victory all within your own head.

          You don’t know **** about boxing. 0 proof as well just an old mouth behind a screen.

          the way you worded it too sounds like a chump “was competitive” or however it went, thats what a noob would say when he got smacked around or they went easy on him. You never beat anyone up outside of a few kids maybe and got kicked out of the gym for doing so!

          still trying to figure out what you proved me wrong in

          Can someone else chime in? What did war room educate me in? Cause I don’t know he keeps mumbling to himself.

          you claim to be some experienced boxer but can’t differentiate style from skills. I said no plebs allowed then low and behold the biggest pleb shows up. You have 0 proof of any if this yet you are waving a victory flag poor senile old man fighting the mirror.
          War Loon educated you in what a loser he is...

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by War Room View Post

            I know what I'm talking about, you're the one who doesn't know the difference between styles and skills.

            This is embarassing now, look at you begging and pandering for someone to chime in and say that Hagler and Robinson share similarities. You've lost mate, dust yourself off and get better for the next one.

            It's funny how you said no plebs, when you were the pleb all along. The longer you drag this out, the longer you look like YDKSAB. I'm not the only one calling you out, IronDanHamza is kicking your **** in the dirt too. YSKSAB, end of story.

            You call Lamotta a boxer, then a brawler, clearly YDKSAB. You have no clue what an aging fighter looks like. Do I have to rehash everything ffs?
            The comment about Hagler as compared to Robinson was about specific technical points used... It never implied any similarity in style. Your inability to comprehend this point is the problem, not the poster's point.

            Comment


            • #56
              The old adage "styles makes fights" comes to mind here. Opposing styles should make for a more entertaining fight providing they aren't mismatches--but that's not always the case. Ali vs. Frazier and Foreman were fights that supported that theory. Mayweather vs. Pacquiao were opposing styles between two highly skilled fighters and was not at all entertaining.

              Comment


              • #57
                This War Room is so ****** he's the first poster ever to make my ignore list. If anyone has been following this convo I honestly have no idea where this guy is coming from he's in his own world lol.

                Comment


                • #58
                  Back on the original topic. Archie Moore and Ali also swapped very similar skills sets, Ali took many things from Moore. Moore was one of the first fighters to utilize a lazer straight, prior to that the right cross was the main power punch from the right hand. Moore used a right straight (like a right jab from the back hand) and Ali made extensive use of it in his comeback, likely maybe due to hand problems as well.

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Originally posted by billeau2 View Post

                    The comment about Hagler as compared to Robinson was about specific technical points used... It never implied any similarity in style. Your inability to comprehend this point is the problem, not the poster's point.
                    This idiot says I call Lamotta a boxer, all he had to do was finish the sentence in the original post. He's so simple lol. I went on to say he was a pressure fighter. I used the word boxer as a blanket statement like "dude" or "fighter", not that he was an on the toes mover. He can't comprehend that. He's made 3 posts about it, and this wasn't even my point LOL. So by defending myself I stoop even lower.

                    and on top of that, it's like arguing if an orange is a fruit. I didn't think anyone would take that away from what I was saying LOL. He truly doesn't understand how ****** he is it's actually hilarious.
                    Last edited by them_apples; 08-17-2022, 08:46 PM.

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by them_apples View Post

                      This idiot says I call Lamotta a boxer, all he had to do was finish the sentence in the original post. He's so simple lol. I went on to say he was a pressure fighter. I used the word boxer as a blanket statement like "dude" or "fighter", not that he was an on the toes mover. He can't comprehend that. He's made 3 posts about it, and this wasn't even my point LOL. So by defending myself I stoop even lower.

                      and on top of that, it's like arguing if an orange is a fruit. I didn't think anyone would take that away from what I was saying LOL. He truly doesn't understand how ****** he is it's actually hilarious.
                      Yes. he takes things TOTALLY out of context. He either is desperate or unable to comprehend language properly. Im going to write below what i wrote to him: he was trolling me and PMed me, he first told me he would bury me, then, (I guess when he tried to dig up dirt) decided to turn tail and claim that he was going to take it easy on me lol. Anyway, I never rant at people lol and when he was threatening me on the PM's at one point he was accusing me of being crazy, so I laughed at him and told him "yeah my two boys call their dad crazy when we discuss certain things lol. Then I qualify that this is in regards to certain political things we banter about... It is obviously made tongue in cheek and this idiot then proceeds to run away claiming "even your wife and kids say you are crazy!" Lol.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP