In their second careers, who do you think was the better fighter, Holmes or Foreman? It's probably going to be popular to say Foreman because of the title winning Moorer stoppage. But until that point George had lost every second of that fight. Both had pretty good showings against Holyfield, though I would lean towards Holmes being better as he didn't have Big George's power. George was outclassed by Morrison and should have lost to Shultz. He should however have gotten the decision over Briggs.
Holmes had the walkover against Mercer and Ferguson and lost a thought decision for the WBC title against Oliver McCall. He also lost a close fight in Denmark against fringe contender and titlist Nielson.
If Larry had Foremans power there would be no doubt who' was better during their second career.
If George had Larry's boxing skills there would be no doubt who was better during their second career.
What say you? Either way, I think it's a very close comparison.
Holmes had the walkover against Mercer and Ferguson and lost a thought decision for the WBC title against Oliver McCall. He also lost a close fight in Denmark against fringe contender and titlist Nielson.
If Larry had Foremans power there would be no doubt who' was better during their second career.
If George had Larry's boxing skills there would be no doubt who was better during their second career.
What say you? Either way, I think it's a very close comparison.
Comment