Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Best MW Champion since Marvin Hagler?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by Nash out View Post
    Prime Golovkin beats prime Hagler with ease. Nash out.
    IDK about that he struggled with Jacobs and the MW division was DOGSHT at the time. Ypu don't remember who the top dogs were back then??? Well below ggg.

    Jorge Heiland
    Kurbsidze
    Tureno Johnson
    Blanco

    LAchargers373 LAchargers373 likes this.

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by Shadoww702 View Post

      IDK about that he struggled with Jacobs and the MW division was DOGSHT at the time. Ypu don't remember who the top dogs were back then??? Well below ggg.

      Jorge Heiland
      Kurbsidze
      Tureno Johnson
      Blanco
      I had him beating Jacobs 115-112 on his worst night and Jacob's best night. Hagler drew with Vito Antuofermo (imagine the stick GGG would get for that!) Lost to Willie Monroe!!! Lost to Bobby Watts. Who? Won an SD (debated) over Jimmy Owens (6-2) drew with Ray Searles, a man unknown out of his own house. Add these results to Golovkin's resume and how much stick does he get! Facts. The old guys get way too many passes. Always excuses. The current crop are held to much higher standards. Golovkin is much better than Hagler imo. Nash out.

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by Nash out View Post

        I had him beating Jacobs 115-112 on his worst night and Jacob's best night. Hagler drew with Vito Antuofermo (imagine the stick GGG would get for that!) Lost to Willie Monroe!!! Lost to Bobby Watts. Who? Won an SD (debated) over Jimmy Owens (6-2) drew with Ray Searles, a man unknown out of his own house. Add these results to Golovkin's resume and how much stick does he get! Facts. The old guys get way too many passes. Always excuses. The current crop are held to much higher standards. Golovkin is much better than Hagler imo. Nash out.
        Tru! But the article is who's been better since not is he better

        So I went with B-Hop and Toney but yes I could see gg beating them also.

        I would want to see at least a few fights between all 3 of them to be more sure

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by Shadoww702 View Post

          Tru! But the article is who's been better since not is he better

          So I went with B-Hop and Toney but yes I could see gg beating them also.

          I would want to see at least a few fights between all 3 of them to be more sure
          They'd be great fights for sure. Though with Toney, you can never tell who would turn up. If Toney had more discipline, he would have been a bigger monster than he already was. But the facts are, boxers from the past - bad result = give them a pass, an excuse, etc. Current day guy - bad result = bum. This can't be argued. Nash out.

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by Nash out View Post

            I had him beating Jacobs 115-112 on his worst night and Jacob's best night. Hagler drew with Vito Antuofermo (imagine the stick GGG would get for that!) Lost to Willie Monroe!!! Lost to Bobby Watts. Who? Won an SD (debated) over Jimmy Owens (6-2) drew with Ray Searles, a man unknown out of his own house. Add these results to Golovkin's resume and how much stick does he get! Facts. The old guys get way too many passes. Always excuses. The current crop are held to much higher standards. Golovkin is much better than Hagler imo. Nash out.
            That has got to be one of the most amateurish evaluation of a fighter's early career I have yet encountered on this forum. To not know who Monroe and Seales were exposes your ignorance and suggests you should sing the praise of your own greatness over in NSB were your lack of real knowledge won't be so noticeable.

            In fact I noticed you were on that 7th grade girl's list of the most popular kids on the forum. You should stick with that nonsense it goes well with the childish manner in which you present yourself in third person.

            But mostly, don't evaluate Hagler, you are too ignorant for this section to get away with that; here, your lack of knowledge is obvious.

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by Willie Pep 229 View Post

              That has got to be one of the most amateurish evaluation of a fighter's early career I have yet encountered on this forum. To not know who Monroe and Seales were exposes your ignorance and suggests you should sing the praise of your own greatness over in NSB were your lack of real knowledge won't be so noticeable.

              In fact I noticed you were on that 7th grade girl's list of the most popular kids on the forum. You should stick with that nonsense it goes well with the childish manner in which you present yourself in third person.

              But mostly, don't evaluate Hagler, you are too ignorant for this section to get away with that; here, your lack of knowledge is obvious.
              Willie Pep, what you know about boxing could be written on the back of a postage stamp. The fact that you live and die by your own bias speaks volumes. Nash out.

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by Nash out View Post

                Willie Pep, what you know about boxing could be written on the back of a postage stamp. The fact that you live and die by your own bias speaks volumes. Nash out.
                Not.much of a come back princess - let me continue, it is one thing to jerk off all men do it, but we don't post your sexual fantasies as our avatar. Your avatar makes you look like a 12 year old boy who carries around a Playboy center fold, folded up in his pocket, showing it to his friends. You come across kind of icky.

                Yes I really don't like you; don't like your play at being deliberately arrogant - you want to be a troll and piss people off, I get it, you got it - I am happy to give you what you want - I have decided you are my New Year's resolution.

                So let's start with changing the avatar it makes suggestions about you that are questionable not to mention probably illegal. How old is the child on that picture?

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by Willie Pep 229 View Post

                  Not.much of a come back princess - let me continue, it is one thing to jerk off all men do it, but we don't post your sexual fantasies as our avatar. Your avatar makes you look like a 12 year old boy who carries around a Playboy center fold, folded up in his pocket, showing it to his friends. You come across kind of icky.

                  Yes I really don't like you; don't like your play at being deliberately arrogant - you want to be a troll and piss people off, I get it, you got it - I am happy to give you what you want - I have decided you are my New Year's resolution.

                  So let's start with changing the avatar it makes suggestions about you that are questionable not to mention probably illegal. How old is the child on that picture?
                  She's in her 20s, bum. That's your comeback! Boy, that was bad. Keep hiding behind the name of an overrated veteran, chump. You are a nobody on this forum and you know jack **** about boxing. Nash is muting you. You are the worst poster on this site and not worth his time. The Great Nash out.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by Nash out View Post

                    She's in her 20s, bum. That's your comeback! Boy, that was bad. Keep hiding behind the name of an overrated veteran, chump. You are a nobody on this forum and you know jack **** about boxing. Nash is muting you. You are the worst poster on this site and not worth his time. The Great Nash out.
                    Good boy - in only two posts. I am getting good at this.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by Nash out View Post
                      Prime Golovkin beats prime Hagler with ease. Nash out.
                      Christ, what a goon you prove to be. Hagler would walk right through GGG, chopping him up fine. I see you really DO know nothing, Nash outlandish, and were even dumb enough to include the phrase "with ease." Hagler faced bigger punchers, and they could not hurt him. GGG made a career of feasting on scrubs and waiting for Canelo, whom he admittedly beat at least once.
                      billeau2 billeau2 likes this.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP