I just rewatched the fight with as unbiased eye as I could and ignored the commentating. This fight was so close it could have been ruled a draw. The score card was absurd. Jones was flashier but a great deal of his punches were grazing shots or didn't even land. Hopkins defense was great and he landed better punches when he did, but the commentators often ignored them because they were simply not as flashy.
Hopkins did a lot of waiting around himself which didn't help his case, however he was the one bringing the fight most of the time so that should be taken into account as well.
I remember the first time watching the fight years ago and it seems like Jones was winning it handily if you don't pay attention. Jones will throw flashy shots and the commentating will be following his lead and confirming to everyone he's landing. Until you realize that half the shots aren't landing at all and Hopkins' defense was great. This seems to be one of the biggest problems with boxing, is having judges and commentators in your pocket. There's been many heavily manipulated wins that were literally sold to the casuals over the years with biased commentating and corrupt judges.
What they should have done was followed the fight accurately and explained that this fight is dead even and could go either way, this would have pressured Jones into a rematch earlier. Based off the later rounds which Hopkins started winning handily, Jones to me didn't want to fight Hopkins again.
Comment