Originally posted by Cotto Rules
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
What Heavyweights In Your Mind Defeat A Prime Joe Louis (Past Or Present)?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by GJC View PostI agree Walcott won the fight but he wasn't prime was he?
So nearly got something right then just snatched it away again.
Thats where you go wrong you get so carried away with this Louis hate you rant rather than make sensible posts.
Still guess thats why you abuse the privilage of being a **** I suppose.
Comment
-
Originally posted by GJC View PostI agree Walcott won the fight but he wasn't prime was he?
So nearly got something right then just snatched it away again.
Thats where you go wrong you get so carried away with this Louis hate you rant rather than make sensible posts.
Still guess thats why you abuse the privilage of being a **** I suppose.
Now, to absolutely wreck your little nitpicking post yet again, what is your point? The fact that you say Walcott wasn't prime only discredits your hero even more. Get your head in the game mate.
And if somehow you meant Louis wasn't in his prime, that is a disgusting excuse just like him not being prime against Schmeling the first time. But of cource, if it's Joseph the great bumbeater it's ok. He never lost in his prime and would have beaten every fighter in history. The same wife beater who got his arse kicked by a Light Heavyweight, was outslicked or KO'd by any great fighter he faced, was knocked down and made to do the chicken dance by BUMS etc.
I see you lads still live in a fantasy world. Don't worry, I won't take away your crystal meth.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Slimey Limey View PostWow now, we got a NEW GJC. Ladies and lads he has become a tough guy now who uses bad words and is confrontational.
Now, to absolutely wreck your little nitpicking post yet again, what is your point? The fact that you say Walcott wasn't prime only discredits your hero even more. Get your head in the game mate.
And if somehow you meant Louis wasn't in his prime, that is a disgusting excuse just like him not being prime against Schmeling the first time. But of cource, if it's Joseph the great bumbeater it's ok. He never lost in his prime and would have beaten every fighter in history. The same wife beater who got his arse kicked by a Light Heavyweight, was outslicked or KO'd by any great fighter he faced, was knocked down and made to do the chicken dance by BUMS etc.
I see you lads still live in a fantasy world. Don't worry, I won't take away your crystal meth.
Comment
-
Originally posted by GJC View PostShould I type slower so you understand. Louis wasn't prime. Louis was prime for 1st Schmelling fight and lost fair and square past his best by Walcott. Re the NEW me don't worry its just for you as I think you were having trouble understanding anyone speaking sensibly to you.
It doesn't matter how you type, you suck arse at explaining your opinion. You need to reword your posts after you type them, mate.
Now, progress here. I got you admitting Joseph was prime vs Schmeling.
Louis had won his last 15 fights by stoppage and was 33 years old himself. He wasn't past his prime and you know it. Walcott MADE him look bad because he was the better fighter and Louis was simply overrated.
There is 2 fighters who beat a prime Louis. There are many fighters who are better than both of them so that is why Joseph Louis would lose against everybody.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Slimey Limey View PostThe NEW GJC again ladies and lads. Aren't you just impressed by his new demeanor? What an impressive change of personality.
It doesn't matter how you type, you suck arse at explaining your opinion. You need to reword your posts after you type them, mate.
Now, progress here. I got you admitting Joseph was prime vs Schmeling.
Louis had won his last 15 fights by stoppage and was 33 years old himself. He wasn't past his prime and you know it. Walcott MADE him look bad because he was the better fighter and Louis was simply overrated.
There is 2 fighters who beat a prime Louis. There are many fighters who are better than both of them so that is why Joseph Louis would lose against everybody.
Very creative with your facts, the 15 fights you mention were over the previous 7 years no? A little thing called the 2nd world war got in the way Louis after the war was not the same fighter as he was before it.
Talking of admitting things you now say Louis would lose to everybody?
Comment
-
-
Comment
Comment