Who Are The Most Obnoxious Nuthuggers On NSB?

[Knighte]

There are thousands of boxers who could reasonably be called a piece of ****. LaMotta, Monzon, Robinson, Corrales and countless others who beat their wives black and blue. Liston and his mob associates, convicted rapist Ayala, convicted murderers Lyle and DeJesus, Mayweather convicted of assaulting two women. Marciano wasn't an angel either. Very few Mother Theresas in boxing.

But none of them lost to Buster Douglas in their prime.

[JAB5239]

[QUOTE]

Vitali is my no.2 favorite fighter today. Nothing can change that (except plaster or something...)

I just went through one of the klit lover threads and that guy fulcrum is a standout. He is the prototype and mother of all nuthuggers. I can understand that knowledgeable fans get a bit tired of this bs. Still credit to themanchine for educating him although it as expected had little effect.

Here's some amazing quotes from the thread:

All those quotes are classic, but the second one is priceless!! Scrotum will never be confused with another poster actually having boxing knowledge, thats for sure.

[Kid McCoy]

But none of them lost to Buster Douglas in their prime.

So it's okay to be a piece of ****, provided you don't lose to someone you shouldn't lose to in your prime? In any case, Buster Douglas was a talented fighter. His problem was he lacked dedication and his heart was never really in the sport. A combination of factors led to him getting both of those right for the Tyson fight, where he showed how good he could have been.

[StarshipTrooper]

So it's okay to be a piece of ****, provided you don't lose to someone you shouldn't lose to in your prime? In any case, Buster Douglas was a talented fighter. His problem was he lacked dedication and his heart was never really in the sport. A combination of factors led to him getting both of those right for the Tyson fight, where he showed how good he could have been.

People like to derride Douglas but the truth is he had all the physical tools and talent to be an ATG. What he was missing was the X factor that makes a great fighter. Call it desire, dedication, mental toughness, whatever: Douglas lacked it and wasted his talent. For one night in Tokyo, fighting for his dead mother, he had the X factor and showed what he COULD have been.

Poet

[them_apples]

douglas was boxing right when he left the womb, but yea, didn't have it mentally.

[them_apples]

But none of them lost to Buster Douglas in their prime.

Dempsey lost to some pretty bland names in his prime....

Lewis arguably did to..

[StarshipTrooper]

Dempsey lost to some pretty bland names in his prime....

Lewis arguably did to..

As did Walcott. The difference is you have to take losses for old timers like Dempsey and Walcott in context of the era that they fought: Walcott would take fights every week sometimes, sometimes more than one in a night, and would fight half-starved for chump change just so he could buy a meal.

Lewis' losses were to fighters who, while not great, wheren't bad either. Both McCall and Rahman were fighters who, if you came in unfocused, where capable of pulling an upset.

Poet

[them_apples]

As did Walcott. The difference is you have to take losses for old timers like Dempsey and Walcott in context of the era that they fought: Walcott would take fights every week sometimes, sometimes more than one in a night, and would fight half-starved for chump change just so he could buy a meal.

Lewis' losses were to fighters who, while not great, wheren't bad either. Both McCall and Rahman were fighters who, if you came in unfocused, where capable of pulling an upset.

Poet

I realize the losses Dempsey took were from starvation and improper rest, but if you are going to take in things like that into consideration, the same could be said about Tyson being under-conditioned, or in a poor mental state (his own fault) all we have is a resume to look at. All of these guys have the L.

and yes, same goes for Lewis, he came in under prepared. If knighte is going to use his pathetic reasoning though, all these things should be brought up. For him though, Tyson is the only exception apparently.

[THRILLA77]

whats wrong with being a klit licker??????***

[StarshipTrooper]

I realize the losses Dempsey took were from starvation and improper rest, but if you are going to take in things like that into consideration, the same could be said about Tyson being under-conditioned, or in a poor mental state (his own fault) all we have is a resume to look at. All of these guys have the L.

and yes, same goes for Lewis, he came in under prepared. If knighte is going to use his pathetic reasoning though, all these things should be brought up. For him though, Tyson is the only exception apparently.

I only bring such things up when the are outside the controll of the fighter. If something is his own damn fault, then he lost deservedly and has no room to complain. I happen to like Lewis but you'll never hear me excuse his losses to McCall and Rahman. He didn't show up focused and he paid the price, too bad. Those things a fighter has control over that he slacks at ultimately effect his overall standing as a fighter. Tua is a good example: He lost considerable standing by coming into fights undertrained and overweight. That Tua's fault not anyone elses and is part of how we evaluate how good a fighter he was.

Poet