Khan is fater, more skilled, stronger, hungrier and has the better chin.
you think khan wouldnt have gone down from those shots in the pacquiao fight? also those shots from lazcano that rocked hatton wouldve jellied khans legs:booty:
perhaps he has a slightly better chin then but that s all
i dno khans is pretty bad, tbh i think hattons punch resistance has gone but none on the level of khan who got knocked down by feather fisted limond and craig watson in the ams with headgear on
Has anyone noticed that for a young prospect, Fury has fought tough competition early in his career already? He is like the gamboa of the heavyweight division.(all balls)
Not saying anything is spectacular on his resume just yet, but that the guys he has fought have had experience in the professional ring. Fighting guys that are 25-3 losses is no joke. They have experience over him, and he destroys them in the ring!
yeah hes got balls all right, also for a heavyweight in his fights there is almost no clinching so it makes for exciting fights
You could've said the same about floyd vs margarito in 2006 but floyd chose not to fight margarito.
is that the same margarito that has 6 losses and has been found to be a cheat? :bottle:
i cant see how anyone could think khan would win this, sure hes quick but michael gomez said he had no power so he aint knocking hatton out, and i cant see him keeping hatton off him for too long, i'd go with hatton ko in first 3 rounds
:boxing: