Morales clearly lost whether it was scored close or wide doesn't really matter. .
Anyone *****ing about Marquez losing to Pacquiao in their 3rd fight doesn't know anything about boxing, or probably mexicans who could not accept that their best current fighters only claim to fame is a draw and 2 losses against the p4p best fighter in the world.
All Marquez did was counterpunch all night and just tried to equalize Pacquiao's offense but Pacquiao is clearly the aggressor, notwithstanding that he is the champion and therefore the one who has the luxury to do just enough to retain the belt.
Lol at all these wannabes talking down Pac's accomplishments and saying stupid things like Marquez beat Pac, last time I saw them fight Marquez was like a scared ***** content in counterpunching just to avoid the KO punches.
Although competitive, Marquez lost all 3 fights against Pac and there is no way he could beat Pac by just counterpunching.
Bradley might be competitive based on the fact that he is undefeated and has beaten a few good fighters but to say that Bradley is a lot better than Marquez and would surely dominate Pac, it is like saying that you dont know anything about boxing and just too happy that there is finally another black guy stepping up to face Pacquiao.
Nice poser for my morning coffee buddy!
20 title defenses eh? OK let me start my list...here goes
2005 :
Pac-JMM - rematch! for the WBA/IBF belts, Pac KO rd. 6 or by SD
1. Chris John - there can be only one in the WBA!, Pac KO rd. 1
Pac-MAB - rematch! Pac KO rd. 6 or by UD
Pac-Harrison - for the WBO belt, Pac by middle rounds KO or by UD
2006 :
2. Michael Brodie - 1st IBF defense, Pac KO rd. 1
Pac-Chi - for the green WBC belt, Pac by late rounds KO or by UD
3. Rocky Juarez - 1st WBC defense,
4. Abelyan - 1st WBO defense
2007 :
5. Abazi - 2nd IBF defense
6. Archuleta - 2nd WBC defense
7. Sato - 2nd WBA defense
8. Polo - 2nd WBO defense
2008 :
9. Koshimoto - 3rd WBC defense
10. Salido - 3rd IBF defense
I'll stop my fantasy here. Funny list, isn't it? hahahaha LOL :D
The thing is, we really don't know. :confused:
What's funny with that list?? :confused:
I don't think his pride would allow him that. Since tehr wil be no more 4th fight, teh only chance for redemption is by defeating Pac.
But his Papa Arum might not be in favor of a Pac fight in case Morales loses to MAB. His Papa Arum might not want Erik to fight the fighter who beats the fighter who beats Him. Arum might think that its wise for Erik to move up to 135lbs. than to fight the most feared fighter at featherweight in Manny Pac.
Pacquiao is just being honest, JMM-Salido is a sleeper, unlike the MAB-Ayala fight which was a lot more action packed. JMM style is always boring, he's always waiting for the other guy to initiate the action and if the other guy doesnt have the guts to commit, the fight deteriorates into a dancing match.
The JMM fight is a sleeper and the ODH-BHop fight didnt live up to the hype. The supporting bouts fared better than the main events. Jantuah and Diamond did a good job showing what theyve got, hopefully, theyll be able to get more exposure in the future.
It will be a good fight, between two fearless fighters. Its an important fight for both fighters, a career defining fight for Larios and a risky tune up for Pacquiao, not like the safe path taken by Chicken JMM.
It will make the featherweight scene even more interesting.
Pac should fight Morales first because MAB-Pac is a sure thing, Barrera wont retire without fighting Pac again. Morales if beaten by Barrera, on the other hand, might not be interested in fighting Pac, instead He might move up to a higher division to avoid anymore future confrontation with the featherweights again. :eek: :eek: :eek:
Pacquiao will be left out to dry? No . . . no . . . no . . . and what do you think MABs gonna do? If MAB wins then there's much more of urgency for him to fight his tormentor. Does he want to live in the shadow of Pacquiao for the rest of his career? :D
That will make the featherweight and super featherweight division more exciting because MAB will somehow get back in the P4P listing . . . of course not as the featherweight king.
And What ever is the results of that MAB/MORRALES tussle . . .I THINK a PAC/Morrales fight would not be affected at all . . . because it's going to be a fight between 2 p4p fighters.
Exactly. :)
Im also rooting for a Barrera win. I have a lot of respect for Barrera and I want him to have a chance for a rematch with Manny and redeem himself, not necessarily to beat Manny but to make a good account of himself in a rematch and probably retire with his pride restored.
Wez I think is the most sensible poster here. He's reasonable enough and engages in arguments without resorting to name callings and bad mouthings, etc. Although I dont think He's the best when it comes to boxing knowledge, I mean, not that He doesnt know anything about boxing, but rather, a lot of other people here just knows more things about boxing.
Pac will knock Morales out whether He's the wrong guy for Pac to fight or not. 130lbs is just 4 lbs. above 126lbs and Pac has already proven that going up 4 lbs in weight doesnt affect his punching power. Morales is actually the one affected coz since he moved up in weight, he's fights have all gone the distance, meaning, he lost his punching power and only relying on his boxing skills, and he will need more than just his boxing skills in order to beat Pacquiao.
My only concern is that the fight might not last long, coz once Pac finds his range and finds a home for his left straight, He might finish him off early. Pacman, for me is one of the top five best finishers once He sensed that the other fighter is in trouble.