So basically you saw videos of Ali fighting and you decided you don't like Khan because he isn't as good as Ali? By that logic you probably don't like many boxers.
Ali is a legend, Khan is a 23 year old kid. have some perspective.
Pacquiao's hardly the first boxer to do it. It's a good psychological tool to show youre not hurt after you've been on the receiving end of a good combo/flurry.
This is the first bit of info that actually makes me think Peterson might be telling the truth. I still doubt it, but it opens up the possibility slightly.
Not to sound like an ass but if USADA/WADA doesn't catch it, then why is it such a big deal? To my knowledge that is the top of the line testing and if it doesn't care to go to that low of ratio then it must be that important. I'd like an explanation as to why USADA/WADA only test to a 6 to 1 ratio but the other testing is more strict.
A lot of people aren't understanding what tests were involved. Peterson would have failed the radioisotope test no matter whether it was performed by USADA, WADA, or VADA.
But USADA and WADA only perform the radioisotope test after a pretest. - when certain testosterone metabolites are found to be in a ratio greater than 6 to 1 or 4 to 1. The radioisotope test requires more specialized equipment to perform, which is why it is not done more often.
It's a classic case of the cheats being ahead of the anti-doping boards. They knew about the metabolite ratio loophole and tailored the steroids to exploit it.
Bottom line is, you would only get a positive result if you've been doping. Hence why Peterson has now admitted to taking testosterone and is instead claiming it's for medical reasons....because he's been busted.